TLDW: The video speculates that it’s because the mouse charges so fast and lasts for so long that it’s not a big issue, and dismisses people who are complaining by saying that they probably aren’t the ones using the mouse anyway.
Hilarious that you responded to a post that was about design wasting user time with a _video_ that takes 2.5 minutes to say, "...well, it doesn't necessarily waste that much time. It charges quickly."
Ie 5:34 video about a totally unrelated things somehow trying to explain why the mighty Apple [0] couldn't place a USB port like a people who care [1] about their users.
FYI: Magic Mouse 2: Release date: October 13, 2015
> 2 minutes of charging will power the magic mouse for 9 hours
This seems in contradiction with what the article says:
> Now. If the mouse had ultracaps instead of batteries, it would charge in seconds, and none of this would be an issue. But it doesn’t. It has batteries. And they charge very slowly. I checked: I plugged it into my mac, and watched the charge indication. It. rises.. very… slowly….
No contradiction. It _does_ charge slowly, but charging for 2 minutes will still power it for a few hours. A full charge takes 2-3 hours, but lasts for a month or more (depending on usage).
THANKS!!! My 4-month-pending update now works. :-)
Amazing how you guys keep the web up and running, while the planet is "sleeping"... Reminds me of the Nightwatch guys.
Believe it or not. I procastinated my update of certbot (ACME2) like about 4 month now. This evening I pulled all my enthusiasm to finally update... did a dry-run. No success. WTF??! Looking up and down... searched problem on my end... just to find out: ha! it's not me.
OK. I'll wait. And check https://letsencrypt.status.io/
It's exactly the opposite. Jamulus is far more mature, first release is from 2006.
The Sonobus UI is nice and responsive, coming from JUCE, but it's not native. More features, like metronome, are nice to have, but most musicians won't use them anyway as the instruments are usually connected through DAWs which provide all the necessary instruments for routing and layering sources.
The main difference is in the architecture, Sonobus is p2p, so it's great users have the option to try different approaches and find what works best for them.
Definitely Interesting! Especially as the cited scientific papers tell us the principle is possible.
But I wonder: has the manufacturer classified this as a medical device in the FDA sense?
Was it developed and tested like so? Question to the OP.
My bad. I asked two questions. Thanks for answering the second one. Raises already some confidence.
But could you answer the first (and more important one)? The website is silent on this topic.
Would be cool. Wish you all the best for your product launch.
sorry, I didn't understand your first question. we have been certified as a medical device, but we do not plan to enter the market of doctors. we originally developed NOTA as a device for home diagnostics of moles. However, when we wanted to get the 510k FDA certificate, we were told that they would test the device as a medical device, because there was already a precedent in 2018.
if I still haven't answered your first question, please clarify
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMSJuatmOdk