How is it different from Onecli ? And does it do credential stripping ? Will it support access SDK from Bitwarden and integrate with infiscal ?

To be honest, I haven't used OneCLI personally before so I can't speak to it in detail but Agent Vault does take a similar approach with the MITM architecture and setting HTTPS_PROXY in the agent's environment to route traffic through the proxy; we feel like this is the right approach in terms of interface-agnostic ergonomics given that agents may interact with upstream services thru a number of means: API, CLI, SDK, MCP, etc.

Since we are in the beginnings of Agent Vault (AV), I wouldn't be surprised if there were many similarities. That said, AV likely takes a different approach with how its core primitives behave (e.g. define specific services along with how their auth schemes work) and is specifically designed in an infra-forward way that also considers agents as first class citizens.

When designing AV, we think a lot about the workflows that you might encounter, for instance, if you're designing a custom sandboxed agent; maybe you have a trusted orchestrator that needs to update credentials in AV and authenticate with it using workload identity in order to mint a short-lived token to be passed into a sandbox for an agent - this is possible. I suspect that how we think about the logical design starting from an infra standpoint will over time create two different experiences for a proxy.

If I understand correctly regarding credential stripping then yes. The idea is that you set the credentials in Agent Vault and define which services should be allowed through it, including the authentication method (e.g. Bearer token) to be used together with which credential.

We don't have plans yet to integrate with Bitwarden at this time but this could be something worth looking into at some point. We definitely would like to give Agent Vault first-class support for Infisical as a storage for credentials (this way you'd get all the benefits of secrets rotation, dynamic secrets, point in time recovery, secret versioning, etc. that already come with it).

NVIDIA's OpenShell also has its own version of this, though its also in very early stages.

It looks a lot like OneCLI too. Curious how it differs.

We're still in the early innings of credential brokering so there'll be a lot of overlap but I expect the way the tool evolves will start to diverge a lot since we are thinking very infra-workflow first.

See my other comment regarding an example of this.

The word agent is used 142 times in this single blog post, They are going overboard.

Agree, trying to out-agent the other agent platforms... Looks more like hype than anything useful.

Looks like ChatGPTs answer to claude managed agents, but using existing ChatGPT Business subscription and not API Keys. With one Caveat , it needs to be invoked from ChatGPT or Slack does not support invoking from APIs, so cannot embed it. Also google launched agent cli today to build own one and integrate with Gemini enterprise https://developers.googleblog.com/agents-cli-in-agent-platfo...

In demo videos, it shows Memory under Files, so i assume it holds learnings and shared context.

Yeah, the memory is cool, just a file store that you can instruct the agent to use however you see fit.

Thanks for making it open source, Jira Support would be good

Good point! Adding that to our list of to-dos - we don't use Jira but I guess it's still very popular!

@jawiggins saw your repo it looks like openAI symphony but better as it works across multiple agents and issue trackers and the feedback loop is great . One feature request though - can you add plan mode ? Your issues are so detailed it becomes plan to implement (but I guess your plan mode is currently happening outside of GitHub issues ) but let’s say issue is “implement support for plan mode” there should be back and forth with agent with issue tags pointing to opus max and/or plan mode - so we can correct agents plan back and forth and once tag is removed it can start implementing or something similar ?

Thanks for the feedback. Earlier I expected I'd need to do more back and forth with the agents before accepting their work but in general I've found it isn't needed.

I do have some features coming up that will improve the ability to converse with the agent as it's running. I'll make a note to add in a plan setting so you can have that run and converse before it gets going.

Thanks for considering it. So how are you doing it now ? Who is generating the plan inside of issue ex: https://github.com/jonwiggins/optio/issues/418

Do you just add the Issue Title like this "feat: CLI improvements — status dashboard, workflow commands, shell completions" and it generated the plan in issue body and started working on it OR is the plan generated by another ai agent and copied to issue body for pickup by optio ?

Interesting approach but how do you download Google Docs, XLS and Slack threads etc.. and how is it saved in obsidian, are they all converted to markdown before saving or summarized to extract key topics and saved. What about images ?

great project but non commercial license, makes me not to go near it.

I see. I haven't decided on the commercial license yet. This might be temporary. I started this as part of another for-profit side project (for dubbing videos with AI). I may change the license later as the quote unquote "copyright owner". If I see the open-source community is active and finds it useful, I'd switch to a free-er license. Things are not super clear yet to me re what can be done with a web based video editor.

I personally don't see a problem with having the code be for non-commercial use only, but your hosted instance probably should allow commercial use. Otherwise I don't see how you're going to become the Photopea of video, which you stated as a goal.

Thanks for the feedback! I honestly had not read the license thoroughly. I just changed it to ELv2.

+1 for seeking clarity on commercial use.

I want to support some colleagues with automating some of the setup of routine video editing. Can't consider this impressive work without that clarity!

Thanks so much for the feedback. I just changed the license to ELv2.

Can you please share source code for the Resources/Prompts example ?

Awesome work, Would be good to have it work with handy.computer. Also are there plans to support streaming ?

Just tried out Handy. This is much better and lightweight UI than the previous solutions I've tried out! I know it wasn't you intention, but thank you for the recommendation!

That said, I now agree with your original statement and really want Voxtral support...

Handy is awesome! and easy to fork. I highly recommend building it from source and submitting PRs if there are any features you want. The author is highly responsive and open to vibe-coded PRs as long as you do a good job. (Obviously you should read the code and stand by it before you submit a PR, but I just mean he doesn't flatly reject all AI code like some other projects do.) I submitted a PR recently to add an onboarding flow to Macs that just got merged, so now I'm hooked

thanks for your contribution :)

I'm looking into porting this into transcribe-rs so handy can use it.

The first cut will probably not be a streaming implementation

Discovering Handy was a revelation - light years ahead of any other tool in this space IMO. Thank you for building it!

okay... so I cannot get this to run on my mac. maybe something with the burn kernels for quantized?

will report a GitHub issue

this should be fixed