For the best experience on desktop, install the Chrome extension to track your reading on news.ycombinator.com
Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | history | MadRabbit's commentsregister

i did, seems a bit strange to me to be honest. do you use it? can you give some feedback?


I do use it. It makes a lot more sense if you use something like LISP or Clojure because (parens are king).

I really enjoy programmer dvorak. As you say, re-training copy and paste is a bit of a task, but my hands feel far less fatigued typing on dvorak than on Qwerty. Now I am type-fluent in both due to necessity and public terminals, but prefer to use programmer dvorak. I really like the numerical layout because there is some rhyme and reason: Left hand from middle out: 91357%, right hand from middle out: 02468` ... so it's a lot easier to type numbers because of that break-up. I don't mind having to hit shift for numbers because it makes for faster coding.


interesting. thanks for the feedback, maybe I will give it a try some day


you're so cute when you try to look all grownup and important )


What, is this layout serious? I would reply seriously if I thought it was, and that reply would be along the lines of the above with less snark, and a note that I have an immediate aversion to anything that labels itself as "rockstar" seriously.


I thought it means "Rockstar Games developers". No idea why would they force this crappy layout, though.


lucky you :)


fair point. thanks!


because that's an extra moving part, i will have to handle those compiled files separately, collect them somewhere, copy to S3 or whatevers. I don't want that. I want a simple thing that has just the content and a shallow presentation layer that just shows the content in a browser, that's it. No extra transformations or anything, this way the system is immediate and simple. markdown + front-end, no other moving parts



looks like it works perfectly


Hm, really? When I click on those links they all show me that they didn't find anything. Ok I see that google did find what I was looking for, I wasn't expecting that. But none of the other search engine did for me. I only got: "No more results.", "По вашему запросу ничего не нашлось", "No results found for site:http://nikolay.rocks How I Blog Now." and "We did not find results for: site:http://nikolay.rocks How I Blog Now."

When I remove "sites:" from the query then they all find this page on GitHub: https://github.com/MadRabbit/nikolay.rocks/commit/58a90810f1...

But that doesn't seem like a nice thing to read, I mean it is better than nothing, but to do that you wouldn't need your own domain and all the JavaScript.


all search engines are javascript enabled those days. google indexes nikolay.rocks perfectly. i have analytics running and everything on it


i used jekyll as well, and it's alright. this thing gives you the same workflow minus dependency on ruby runtime or a specific hosting platform that supports jekyll (like github for example).

i just write stuff and git push it to heroku


I suppose I chose dependency on Ruby over dependency on client-side JS, though they're not mutually exclusive anyway.

It's a neat concept, for sure, and incredibly similar to something I once wanted to implement for photo galleries (and might still, since this actually seems to work quite well).


that's like saying that "if you can't print it on punch cards it's all bad". the progress didn't stop with lynx. probably good 90% of the modern internet won't work without javascript


i use the engine for some commercial work at the moment, i might open-source it eventually as well (if there is enough interest in it). but at the moment it's just a bunch of make-shift scripts thrown together which are not really in a publisheable shape


That's reasonable, of course, but it makes the title of this story rather inaccurate.

Even so, kudos -- your blog is lightning fast and a pleasure to use.

I did try it on my low-end Android phone w/Chrome, and it's plenty fast, and the menu works well, but the header and text overflow the view port.


thanks! i don't have a small android, but i'll see if i can fix it with some google chrome emulator on desktop


My apologies -- I updated Chrome and it works fine. That or you fixed something. Either way, nice job.


no problem. i didn't touch anything yet. but i did optimize it for iphone5 at some point, so that might be it.

but, thank you for letting me know about it either way! :)


But I can't modify the engine...


there is no server side


> there is no server side

According to the blog:

  There is a small #nodejs server that basically
  does mode-rewrite and sends index.html file for
  any HTTP request.
Sounds like a "server side" to me.


It's served over http so I disagree.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search:

HN For You