For the best experience on desktop, install the Chrome extension to track your reading on news.ycombinator.com
Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | history | more MarsIronPI's commentsregister

Seconded SuperTuxKart! The engine is really impressive when they push it.

I'm still nostalgic for the pre-1.12 Heir to the Throne portraits. Bring back anime Konrad and Li'sar!

(There's an add-on for that too btw)


> I would love to see a Nintendo Switch port of this game, if anyone is interested in making one!

I think many would be, but AIUI it's illegal. It would require modifying the source to use Nintendo's SDK which is under NDA. The GPL would require releasing the modified source, which would be prohibited by the NDA. So it's legally impossible without special permission from every single Wesnoth contributor ever.

Unless you mean a homebrew port, in which case it's doable.


There's actually an add-on for this (and a bunch of other things too): Advance Wesnoth Wars. It adds options for XP-for-healing but also for making terrain affect damage taken rather than chance to hit (which is fun when you get tired of the randomness).

This fork[0] of a fork of the original allegedly works with 1.18. I haven't tested it, because these days I play with the built-in predictable RNG and it suffices for me.

https://github.com/ilya-ilya/Advance_Wesnoth_Wars


> built-in predictable RNG

What's that?


Essentially it makes it so that if your attack is 4 swings attacking a unit on 50% defense territory, it will hit twice and miss twice every time. Any remainders are dealt with randomly, but the seed is based on the save, so it removes save-scumming (which has always tempted me, and I don't like).

> Honestly, this doesn't seem unreasonable to me. At some point, you have to cut off previous technologies because virtually everyone's moved to something better. You also can't buy tickets any more by snail mail with an enclosed check.

As long as the technologies you move to are equally freedom- and privacy-respecting. If I have to use a non-free spyware app to buy your tickets I'm not buying. Now, if you let me pay for and download a PKPASS that I can use on my fully-libre GrapheneOS smartphone then sure.


You need to stop the people with guns from killing you and your stormtroopers. That's what the Second Amendment is for.

The people who bay loudest about that second amendment have long signaled that they will kill to keep Trump in power. They've been salivating for an excuse to shoot democrats for decades. They have been openly advocating for the murder of democrats for ages. Democrat politicians were literally murdered in the past few years and they don't give a fuck, because they support it.

Trump is already well beyond the confines of the Constitution. If the 2A crowd gave a fuck about rights other than larping soldiers, they would have already marched on him. He has openly declared that guns should be taken away from people and that having a gun on you at a protest should justify shooting you. The 2A crowd continues to support him fully.


> He has openly declared that guns should be taken away from people and that having a gun on you at a protest should justify shooting you.

OK, I'm calling you on this one. Source please.


Donald Trump's first term included him saying, literally "Take the guns first, due process second"

https://www.c-span.org/clip/white-house-event/user-clip-dona...

Here's about the second claim

https://time.com/7358403/nra-trump-clash-gun-carrying-rights...

"He shouldn't have been carrying a gun" says Trump about someone fully in compliance with US law, who never even drew his weapon. "You can't walk in with guns". It's up to you to look up discussions about Kyle Rittenhouse and what republicans and Trump supporters believed about bringing a gun to a protest not very long ago.

Elected twice by the "(2A rights) SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" crowd. You can bet they will continue to support him.


> Either the US hasn't been a democracy in the first place.

Well, it really wasn't, and still isn't. It's a republic: the people decide who make the laws and who executes them. In between these choices there's never really been anything for the people to do but ask their representatives to do things.


I'm sad because I have an OLPC XO-1, which is i586 and I suspect that it's next on the chopping block.

> How does the concept of the global citizen survive?

Why do we need this concept? Find a country you can be proud of, become a citizen, join its culture, and defend it when it is threatened. Don't go live somewhere or get citizenship just because it's convenient.


We don't. But nationalism is out of fashion, there's an expectation that you can move to a different country for work etc.

I agree with you, and I think a lot of the west's issues with immigration stem from not demanding this of immigrants past and present.

But the left isn't engaging with this conversation, and the right are just making hay with the fact that 'immigration isn't working'.

So yes I agree, but that isn't the conversation anyone else is having.


As an American, I fail to see how it is constitutional.

See my other comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653207


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search:

HN For You