For the best experience on desktop, install the Chrome extension to track your reading on news.ycombinator.com
Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | history | more ajhurliman's commentsregister

Maybe they meant the university


How would you handle it? Give them a stern talking-to?


The comment you replied to provides an alternative.


So they steal from you, and then you get the privilege of your tax dollars paying for their room and board. I dunno, I can see why some people might not be chuffed to bits by that solution.


You are welcome to avail yourself of this free room and board anytime you like.


Indeed, but I am uncertain how that relates to my point.


Describing prison as "free room and board" is absurd. People are not going there by choice. They are there because we as a society say they should be there, and we pay for that as a society. Every attempt to not do that (e.g. by charging people for the cost they impose on the judicial system) has turned out to be an exploitative nightmare. Are you also upset that people steal and therefore your tax dollars need to go towards policing?


I didn't say "free room and board" – you did. You also said that going to prison isn't a choice, but also that I can choose to go to prison whenever I want, so which is it?

Someone in a sister thread suggested sharia law and chopping off hands, so clearly there are other alternatives besides "society pays for prison" and "the criminal pays for prison".

And yes, I am upset that people steal and that this causes more of my tax dollars to go to heightened policing. Why wouldn't I be? Presumably the only people that are not upset about that are criminals and potentially the police.


I always thought Google+ should've ditched the "dislike" button for a "nonplussed" button.


I think you’re operating under the assumption that all people should live in big cities.

I think it’s fine if cities get too expensive; people just need to wake up to the idea of “this place is too expensive for me”.

There are lots of very affordable houses in the Midwest, but everyone seems to want to be a star in Hollywood or a financier in New York (no matter how delusional they are).


Tbh it’s a fair question, but we haven’t seen a rapid escalation of incidents in planes from those manufacturers. So I’d venture the guess “not as bad as Boeing”


Kagi is head and shoulder better at finding things that are useful. Google is going the way of AOL.


How do they plan to monetize it? How many people will pay for Search? Will they have an ad-supported version? If so how would their direction be any different when they face the same problems?


It’s a monthly subscription that apparently a lot of people are willing to pay for, feels like an honest business which is shocking in tech.


We don't know if they're profitable doing this. One day, they might go kaput as well.


In the early days a user could go into their setting, see the cost per search, and the total cost of their use per month, compared to what they paid. I threw some extra money their way when I was my use exceeded what I paid. But that was before they changed up their pricing structure.


at least they said they are


How much is "a lot"? The HN bubble doesn't count.


Nearly 24k paying users and ~400k searches per day

https://kagi.com/stats



Yahoo (they’re just a portfolio now right?)


Yahoo is a portfolio of brands. Compare https://www.yahooinc.com/our-brands with firms that manage investments:

https://www.bridgewater.com/

https://www.schwab.com/

https://www.blackstone.com/

https://www.sequoiacap.com/

Yahoo is managing web properties and is essentially a media company (is paid by advertisers or other customers to deliver a well-characterized audience).


Please don’t do that; this is a place for educated, civil people to discuss the nuances of our age, not a political flame war.


It not wrong though. A lot of right wing ideology requires being okay with cognitive dissonance from compartmentalizing opposing views meant for different scenarios. It’s a legitimate point.


the same applies to both sides of the political spectrum


It really doesn’t. One side actively is advocating for a dictatorship and an end to democracy.


In the USA. There are more countries in the world, not sure why a bot should have a left leaning slant just because the American right is stupid. I get it could get that since it is trained on the English web, but there is no reason it has to be left leaning.


So you mean the Democrats? It are you referring to something the Republicans are trying to do?


You say that while the current admin is carrying out a genocide. You’re a prime example of that cognitive dissonance and compartmentalizing mentality.


[flagged]


The current presidential candidate and his party said that at their get together. I don’t think there’s even a far left equivalent when it comes to candidates or parties.


Can I guess if you're a) in your lower 20s or lower, or b) steadily employed with at least a few months of savings and have never been abjectly poor or injured?


> A lot of right wing ideology requires being okay with cognitive dissonance from compartmentalizing opposing views meant for different scenarios

You're not wrong exactly, but you just described human nature. All of our brains work that way by default. It's much harder to see for your own side, of course.


I mean lot of left wing people are the same double thinkers - How would you explain that somebody can be deeply concerned about what Israel does in Palestine, but also cheering up for Russia?

How come that LGBTQ people are concerned about their rights and then support most intolerant Islamist regimes, who would slaughter them on spot?


What about: "I want you to earmark this for open source AI research, and not R&D specifically aimed at making profits"


Even though this has been down voted into oblivion, I’ll bite: to what political ends would you propose the labor class exercise their power?


It's wild to me that tech workers will still downvote stuff like this after the season of layoffs we just had. Google is "trimming the fat" while making 18 billion a quarter. To what end? How about preserving the middle class and ending the monopoly power of these firms?


Because they're temporarily embarrassed founders who could _totally_ see themselves having to make a decision like this.


To the same ends the capitalist class has if they choose. I think the risk is necessary to take, given how the alternative has worked out.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search:

HN For You