unpopular take: SO's problem was never AI. It was that they optimized for answers instead of relationships. The best thing about old SO was finding someone who solved your exact weird edge case and you could see their other answers and learn from their thinking
they should kill Q&A entirely and become the anti-AI platform. A place where senior devs mentor juniors through real problems in real time. Paid. Like a marketplace for technical mentorship. The brand recognition is there, the trust was there, and no AI can replace a human saying "yeah I hit that same bug in production, here's what actually happened"
SO sitting on 15 years of data about who is actually good at what technology. Thats the asset. Not the answers themselves.
Senior devs are getting paid much more to do their actual jobs. Why spend time hanging out on SO? Besides being good in a domain, has nothing to do with pedagogical skill. Its easy to mesmerize junior devs without teaching anything useful. Youtube etc is full of this kind of teacher. And people take time to realize what the value of pedagogical skill really is.
this is incredibly helpful. The point about traveler supply having a different clock than demand is something I’ve thought about. Would love to chat, I tried sending you a message on LinkedIn but couldn’t. Please find my contact in my profile.
knowing how to give AI good context. Thats the skill nobody talks about. I use Claude Code daily and the difference between a lazy prompt and a well structured doc is massive.
also just understanding how the models work. I'm doing an AI masters right now and once you know whats happening under the hood the anxiety disappears.
fair point on being light on details. I'm based in Spain, starting with domestic routes. The trust model is different here than cross-border, no customs involved for national shipments.
The luck and timing point is underrated. Half the reason I'm building this now is because the gig economy normalized "strangers doing tasks for strangers" in a way that wasnt culturally accepted 10 years ago. thanks for comment.
this is exactly what I was hoping to hear, someone who actually did it. Starting with one side where the cost/benefit was obvious and letting the other side follow makes a lot of sense. How long before the athlete side started coming in organically?
really appreciate you sharing this. This insight is huge for me. Do you think it would have worked if you constrained to a single city first instead of going broad?
Honestly, I don't know. We did it for all our country (Spain) and we found the same problem as you.
Feel free to reach out if you have any question, email in my profile
reply