I made a post previously saying that the release of Composer was so odd. It takes lots of dedication and compute power to achieve frontier level, and they suddenly have a benchmark score saying composer is frontier. I love all the innovation that is happening I just hate when actual good product gets shadowed by marketing mongers.

So you're in the Yann Lecun bucket then? I agree his approach is great, however the current LLM approach is far from over we haven't even touched the upper end of it's abilities.

Lots of companies affected this, what blows my mind is when VC's were funding this how come no due-diligence was done on something as important as compliance. who even tries to scam on compliance like it's a known way to get caught.

They're "AI Native". This maps with how the entire "AI revolution" has felt to me - like no due diligence has been done to validate the output of anything, and instead just the "AI" stamp is enough to satisfy investors.

I get where you are coming from, but still claiming "AI native" shouldn't change anything when it comes to due diligence. I agree tho the 'AI stamp" is letting a lot of things through.

I genuinely think this is because the elites like the MIT dropouts that started this company think the rest of us observers are stupid.

They have a billboard with the copy "Compliance before you tell your parents you dropped out of MIT"

Yeah that's a wild billboard lmao. btw 99% of MIT people are no different then the rest they just worked hard or paid hefty amounts, I have lots of friends that went there. Nonetheless the 1% are geniuses. Also saying MIT dropouts instantly makes your story credible, it's a funny concept. I'm starting to feel like an MIT dropout these days.

>btw 99% of MIT people are no different then the rest they just worked hard or paid hefty amounts

I don't think that's true. I didn't get into any elite schools unlike almost all of them.

any benchmarks?