> Which is unusually simple. I would expect Google to use 10 more marketing names simultaneously without any logic to the product lines.

I think they were lucky this time that they landed a good name after only a few iterations that has since stuck.

Anyone remember Google Bard or LaMDA?

The r/Bard subreddit is still quite active for some reason. Reminds me of Google Glass.

I still like the name Bard

Mind sharing an Amazon link to the electric screw driver you used in your video?

I'm fairly sure that's the iFixit precision electric screwdriver: https://www.ifixit.com/products/precision-electric-screwdriv...

Thanks for this tip! The fans of mine have been spinning up regularly, especially noticeable when I upgraded to Tahoe a few days ago.

And to zoom out a bit, Apple has lots of experience selling budget devices e.g. iPhone SE.

Here's a recent comment [1] by an OpenAI engineer confirming that they do in fact make such trade offs between intelligence and efficiency.

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46909905

That comment only says that they have a lot of different options for smaller & faster models that people can opt into. It doesn't say that they dynamically scale things up or down depending on demand.

They did in some instances, not all.

A notable example where they ate $ millions in losses is the Diapers.com story [1] [2].

[1]: https://slate.com/technology/2013/10/amazon-book-how-jeff-be...

[2]: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/07/emails-detail-am...

> While refactoring my code it noticed that it needs to see what this command is which it is invoking, so it even went so far as to search through vs code's user data to find the recent files history if it can find out more about that command... I stopped it and told it that if it has problems, it should tell me.

TIL that there's an especially apt xkcd comic for this scenario: "Zealous Autoconfig"

https://xkcd.com/416/

> There seems to be zero output from they guy for the past 2 years (except tweets)

Well, he made Nanochat public recently and has been improving it regularly [1]. This doesn't preclude that he might be working on other projects that aren't public yet (as part of his work at Eureka Labs).

1: https://github.com/karpathy/nanochat

So, it's generative pre-trained transformers again?

> ... and then it was all killed because Apple did not dare to open source it, or put serious efforts on their own into improving the technical base of the flash player (that had aquired lots of technical dept).

IIRC, they couldn't open source Flash due to its use of a number of 3rd party C/C++ libraries that were proprietary.

Adobe's license with these 3rd parties permitted binary-only distribution so it would have meant renegotiating a fresh license (and paying out $$$) for an EOL codebase that had enormous technical debt, as you also acknowledge in your last sentence.

You could try resetting only the Network Settings to see if that changes anything.

Settings -> Transfer or Reset Phone -> Reset -> Reset Network Settings