I wish projects had a “what is X” link visible on their sites, or HN had some context text which let posters describe why they posted. (Or the OP post the homepage which had all of this info.)

This is a fork of Wordpress 4.9, for anyone else that didn’t know. I’m not qualified to comment on the reasons why they forked.

WordPress 5.0 introduced the single page react app that is the Block Editor, dropping the tinyMCE editor in December 2018.

“ This demo is optimized for desktop screens (1000px+).”

Opportunity missed with me, not everyone browses HN on their desktop.

At least have some screenshots of your app so I am motivated to check later.

I think especially for websites / web apps you'd want to start with a "mobile first" design, as is common in web design.

It's almost always easier to go from lower widths to large widths than the other way around for good responsive designs. This, and 1000px being an arbitrary number, doesn't give me confidence.

I disagree with mobile first design in general. Some apps are meant to be desktop apps, and you can't make them into mobile apps without either severely dumbing them down or just creating a different apps.

Like outlook, which is also an email client. I'm sure there's an outlook smartphone app, haven't used it, but it's certainly a completely different UI and application.

I can usually spot mobile first design from a mile away. Because the app looks stupid on desktop and sort of feels like a toy. Huge buttons, enormous white space, menus for no reason.

This is great feedback. I'll be working on the mobile version right now!

Here's a video, if folks just want to see how it looks: https://x.com/define_app/status/2030023425150910907?s=20

It works when I rotate the phone

I had to rotate the phone then zoom out 60% then it worked, but by then it's unreadable.

And here.

And not here

Same here.

Decent models cost money, is the reality of it.

“less copilot” is because they can’t charge for it, so the model is crap, so no-one wants it, so they are removing it where it’s useless.

They won’t be the last.

I wonder if MS regrets pouring so much money into OpenAI.

Am I right in thinking you’re asking me to put an API in frontend code?

No and please don’t do that.

If you only use it as a personal assistant. You can connect to your llm service directly.

If you plan to integrate it into your web app. It’s better to have a proxy api for the llm and auth the request with cookie or something.

… they’ve built.

Are you living in a separate system that’s not associated with capitalism?

If so I’d love to know what that is so I can go there.

I used a different Ghidra MCP server (LaurieWired's) to, umm, liberate some software recently. I can’t express how fun straightforward it was to analyze the binary and generate a keygen.

I learnt a ton in the progress. I highly recommend others do the same, it’s a really fun way of spending an evening.

I will certainly be giving this MCP server a go.

I have some old software I wrote that calls home to a server that no longer exists to do a cert check that would never pass in order to install it. I tried writing my own Ghidra tool, skill, agent, MCP and still can’t seem to figure it out. I’m positive it’s a “human skill” issue but man… ironic that this pops up the week after I gave up trying.

I've got a old dead multiplayer only game I would love to try and get a basic server online for again.... ( Wulfram II will always be missed )

This branch is 110 commits ahead of LaurieWired/GhidraMCP:main.

The output is “identical” if you’re using the same model. Consider them separate front ends really.

OpenCode - you can easily see the changed files on your branch, it defaults to being permissive with tools, can easily fork a session so you can fix unrelated issues or small issues without consuming context, you can add more “modes” like build and plan as a first class construct, you aren’t limited to just Anthropic models.

Claude Code - you can do all of the above in one way or another, not least if you use an IDE with it

I started using OpenCode to get away from the horrible Claude flicker, but it seems that they have fixed that recently - I don’t think I’ll be going back though, and I use Opus/Sonnet exclusively.

Literally the most important thing you could have included in that README is a few samples of how it looks, and you might have found some people to answer the questions you have.

Even an examples directory in the repo with some samples would have helped.

Which is great UX on a phone.

Honestly, the fact that mobile browsers don't provide a way to see the contents of the title attribute is a severe UX failing on the part of the browser developers, not the website developers, who are literally using the attribute as intended.

Artifical limits because they are on the free plan?

Artifical limits, because they have 40 paid licenses that they can not use, because of a non-disclosed assignment limit that is NOT mentioned in the pricing page nor in the ToS.

A lot of people are angry about this, and I think it's borderline illegal: https://devforum.zoom.us/t/you-have-exceeded-the-limit-of-li...

You pay for something, and you can't use it.

If a company doesn't respond to this it tells you they likely only respond to lawsuits. As a paying customer whose business operations are impacted, you should have standing to sue. Your company could potentially extract from Zoom the entirety of the money that their dumb decision made your company lose. Consult a lawyer for actual advice and next steps.

Of course, it's also possible you signed a contract that basically says "we can just decide not to work and you can't do anything about it" in which case, sucks, and fire whoever negotiates your B2B contracts. But also, those clauses can be void if the violation is serious enough.

Probably not worth the effort, for a couple days of downtime, we'll just move somewhere else.

But I agree, I recognize the silence in that forum thread that was locked without a resolution: some boss said "let they complain or pay, we don't care about them otherwise".

This is why we never changed the licenses, we just made long-running identical ID meetings that everyone can join.

But we’re moving away as it’s only going to get worse.

That's a cool work-around.

What I don't like, is that whenever you contact Zoom, their representatives are taught to say one thing: buy more licenses.

Not only that, but their API/pricing is specifically designed to cover edge-cases that will force you to buy a license.

For example, they don't expose an API to assign a co-host. You can do that via the UI, manually, but not via the API.

Can you share which solution are you moving to?