This is basically a verbatim quote from 2016/2017 when Microsoft, IBM and other tech giants were starting blockchain research divisions, all of which were dissolved by last year lol
Probably so. But as long is there is wage growth for hourly workers, however modest, the scenario where a worker at Business A earning $10/hr quits to take a job at Business B to make $11 will happen frequently enough to generate these kinds of stories.
The psychological momentum of BIS far exceeds that of crypto. BIS and affiliated parties are comprised of thousands of old guard who have built their career and sense of self worth on the belief what they are doing is necessary and beneficial for society. Crypto participants are at max involved a few years and overwhelmingly young 20-somethings.
Just as science advances one funeral at a time, so too will this whole industry. It will help if we just stop debating whether crypto assets are real to begin with, and accept that this stuff isn't going away.
The psychological momentum of cryptobros far exceeds that of central bankers. Cryptobros and affiliated parties are comprised of thousand of vanguard who have built their entire financial future and self worth on their very limited life experience and ignorance of even the most basic economic principles and history, and a technological screw driver behaving as a hammer looking for a nail. BIS participants are, at minimum, involved for decades in global finance and markets with exceptional educations and understanding of the forces at work, unpredictable and unstable they may be.
Just as popular ignorance driven by hype, buzzwords, and FOMO has lead to bubble after bubble, victimization by ponzi schemers, and endless financial fraud, so to will the crypto space. It will help if we just stop debating whether crypto assets function in any way differently than a ponzi scheme and acknowledge they have zero capability of scaling as a currency to meet the demand of global finance, particularly while providing no security or recourse against basic human error like incorrect payee, charge backs, identity theft, etc, and are nothing more than a speculative asset with zero intrinsic value waiting for the next greater fool to come along.
"Just accept that my bags will always be around and eventually worth more than I paid for them"
For a hot minute I thought there might be truly scalable and cheap POS DeFi system with validation running on my phone. If this was an easy technical problem, an answer would already exist. There are plenty of POW/pre-mined/centralized coins, but even ETH/DOT have little to show in terms of progress here. POS/POW DeFi blockchains haven't scaled so far despite plenty of tries. This is fact, and hard to refute. Just look at transaction fees, TPS, and level of centralization.
You seem to like Helium, and I see that their gateways cost ~$1000, where as The Things Network seems to point you to RPi hats at ~$200. If the crypto innovation is effectively making the network more expensive to use and increasing the cost to build it, all so the operators/miners can earn a little on the side, this doesn't seem like innovation at all. Seems like you could do this with some sort of micro payment scheme (where the initial cost can be paid off), especially since LoRa seems to cater to industrial IoT mostly.
If you had a solar powered Things Network, it would be effectively free to use, and you could add more nodes as required at a cheaper cost.
Helium has solved the coverage problem through creating deployment incentive. You're missing the point of helium to such a large degree your post almost sounds like satire.
Someone looking at TCO might think differently. Someone looking at expanding the network at 5x the cost likely would think differently.
LoRa also seems to be a proprietary standard owned by a single company, regardless, there have been mesh networks built with public and private funding that do not artificially keep costs high for longer than needed. If this isn't the goal for Helium, it would be tough to recommend or use.
no one depends on their cryptocurrency like their salary or retirement savings. the total market capitalization of cryptocurrency is basically the total amount of wealth humanity is willing to just throw away
Do you have a rebuttal of any substance or just personal attacks on the author?
The irony of a bitcoiner accusing someone else of drinking the Kool aid. Lots of people participated and made money in Madoff's scheme for decades too.
You'll notice that he refuses to address any aspect of the and doesn't understand graph theory as much as he's pretending to, as noted in the top comment on the post.
It is a logical fallacy to focus on who the author is. You either can point out where the error in his reasoning is, or not. Because it sounded pretty convincing to me: to participate in routing a payment you need to have at least the paid amount tied in the lightning network, which favors people with a lot of spare cash, who can have more channels open, and process more payments.
This sucks. I love Julia, especially for developing analysis tools. I started using Python in place of MATLAB when it was permissible in my work environment, but now I try to use Julia when possible, and almost exclusively in non-professional analysis/data endeavors.
I personally take issue with what Aadhaar is at its core, but the referenced thread of the associations and what's being done with the data is downright horrifying.
Andhra Pradesh leaked #Aadhaar of every school student, their claim is to stop school dropouts. This data is shared with Microsoft which boosts itself for building an AI
Andhra Pradesh built a search portal to search anyone's information using #Aadhaar. This portal was again publicly accessible to anyone. That search portal which everyone says doesn't exists are all over the place
