I think you meant $20 a year. Every known cloud has increased their prices, so personally I saw it coming.

https://bitwarden.com/pricing/

Not to nitpick, there is a 'native' option. Atleast it has been available on Arch for many years now (when SteamOS was on Debian?). In most cases we just the symlink the newer versions of libs to the older versions and the games run fine / better.

It almost is, the first change you'd see is understanding that each container is a separate process and thus for it to auto start you'd need to generate systemd service files. podman has an autogenerator for this, so it is 'just' two extra commands on the terminal but something easy to miss when you are starting out.

What would you do for a Docker Compose stack with Podman? For example, a self hosted app where the actual service, Postgres, Redis live?

Docker compose can work with a podman backend, however if you want a more podman native solution the term you should be looking for is quadlet which is basically systemd files that run the containers.

I am sure TPLink already use OpenWRT as base for many routers

In this case semantics do matter so to keep the improvements in the Software Commons as Commons. Weak / Permissive licenses will ensure that all the voluntarily contributed labour would be enclosed and profitable only to those who can hire an army of engineers. Strong licenses will ensure your call for a free exchange.

Depends. Overly open licenses can also motivate prevent people to not share things. Case in point here is some of the openai stuff where they shared enough so people can replicate their results but without giving away everything. People have been complaining that that's not open enough. But it's still better than them not sharing anything at all. That model certainly seems to be working well for them.

Compare that with e.g. companies in China or elsewhere that are also working on AI that are perhaps sharing a bit less. That's a bit of a black hole in terms of information going in but not coming out. I think the more open people can get the better. But even some weaker licenses are better than nothing.

Things are open enough currently for people to independently replicate each other's results. I think that's the important bit.

At first I thought "Free Organ" here meant human organ and was excited to see something in the field of free (and fair) human organ transplant.

Nothing against the post though.

The majority market share is for Google Chrome, directly and indirectly, thus they are the primary target, while Firefox & Safari will only come next.

AGPLv3 or GPLv3 is a good choice to ensure that all changes stay out in the open. Then the competition becomes who can change the code faster and reach more customers.

>Then the competition becomes who can change the code faster and reach more customers.

That is not very reassuring advice for a small developer who has limited resources. By opening your source code, you have just given up any head start you might have over the competition. They now have access to every line of code you spent hours agonizing over to get it right. Now they can out market you and leverage their vast resources to steal away any of your potential customers.

Hi I see that you are serving your own OSM tiles, can you share how are you generating them? Especially in webp?

I'm using TileMill to generate tiles. I does not support webp. I exported it to png, and then with some one line script converted all png's to webp.

Escitalopram for anxiety works quite well, you should continue with it, mostly along with Therapy to create productive coping mechanisms against anxiety.