For the best experience on desktop, install the Chrome extension to track your reading on news.ycombinator.com
Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | history | more doctorfoo's commentsregister

That's interesting - I have chronic congestion. How much sugar did you eat before you quit? What did "quitting" mean to you? (Just no sweets/cakes/biscuits, or did you go more extreme - no chinese food!?)


I didn't think it was that much ... per day maybe couple of cookies, or a chocolate croissant, or hot chocolate. But almost always some kind of treat everyday. When I quit my nose cleared up in about 5 days, but the sinus headaches lasted another two weeks. That's when I knew something weird was going on.

If I have almost any dessert now I'll have a sinus headache the next day. I can get away with a teaspoon of honey in the morning and that's about it. Berries are ok but I'm still not sure about fruit (bananas are definitely not ok). But I can eat good bread three times a day and I'm fine.


Thanks for the information. I'm definitely going to try this.


In case you are still watching this and want more feedback, let me quote someone else here:

> it's like airbnb but with less privacy?

A lot of these "nomad" ventures have a huge focus on networking, socialising... I'd like to see something catering for introverts as well. Something that ticks all the boxes - self contained room + kitchen, Wifi. Desk, with chair.

Kind of like Airbnb apartments but with a more razor focus, a place with quality control where I know I can get work done. The Airbnb of (small, low budget!) serviced apartments.

General "serviced apartment" facilities might fit this, however they all appear to focus on the premium end - large spacious apartments fit for well salaried business travellers, not freelance tech guys just scraping by.

Heck, all I want is a sound proofed box with Wifi, bed, and a tiny Kitchen. Somewhere I can work in absolute peace, self cater if I wish, but also venture out from now and then.

I understand this is not what you are aiming for, but if you ever need any other ideas... ;)


It's worth bearing in mind their adversary is not "spooks", but rather the MPAA. Is the anonymity good enough to prevent the user getting nasty letters from their ISP?


No, it's not. The anonymous downloading doesn't really work either. It's day 3 of trying to download a 50MB test file right now.


Oh, it's that guy that hates everything.

ChangeTip is cool. It is a Bitcoin killer app. Like it or not, giving tips, even to people who don't need them, is fun. And for every person who is tipped who may not want or need it, I've seen some kid who is quite happy as they realise they've just been gifted something worth a few dollars. And then their journey into Bitcoin begins as they try to figure out how to actually spend it.


It's critical to not conflate Bitcoin with ChangeTip. The two are, in effect, separate currencies. One is decentralized and backed by the blockchain, the other is centralized and backed by a company.

A litmus test for centralized currencies is to ask the question "can they create wealth out of the thin air by manipulating a database entry?" The answer is affirmative for ChangeTip. To their credit, they maintain proof-of-reserves online, so while we do not know the amounts held by their users, we have an idea of how much they can pay out. I applaud the transparency they have shown.

I won't respond to the drive-by ad hominem.


I agree with you about centralized versus decentralized solutions, but ChangeTIp clearly does NOT want to supplant bitcoin- they do their best to keep wallets small, and aren't trying to be a "bitcoin bank" / replacement ala Coinbase. Instead, they're driving adoption. What is there to complain about?


> It's critical to not conflate Bitcoin with ChangeTip. The two are, in effect, separate currencies.

I might be missing something here but ChangeTip is not a currency.


It is, in the same way that MtGox's BTC was independent of Bitcoin towards the end. They keep their own ledger of balances.


> I won't respond to the drive-by ad hominem.

For the record, I appreciate your technical critiques! But you seem to take a perverse delight in being the critic.


>For the record, I appreciate your technical critiques! But you seem to take a perverse delight in being the critic.

Ok, so you enjoy the technical content but disagree with the tone [1]? I can understand that. I genuinely feel sorry I don't have the time to build rapport. Many other bloggers regurgitate things we all agree on and make everyone feel warm and fuzzy inside. I figure that enough people already do this that I only need to chime in when the group-think is headed south.

[1] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Graham's_Hierarchy_o...


> I applaud the transparency they have shown.

They have no choice. There's no regulation around this so companies are forced to be transparent and convince their users they're legit.

We're just not used to companies being transparent because contracts around regulated industry are enforced by the force of law (threats of fine, imprisonment or violence).

We could have many more companies being transparent if only we didn't give them a way to use the force of law to convince users they're covered (think Bank of America and FDIC for instance. I'd rather Bank of America had to prove to me their investments are sound etc)


Had EGS as my Systems prof at Cornell.

Can confirm that he doesn't hate everything and is actually a really cool guy :)


That explains what I saw in a few Reddit threads where a user was tipping everyone for no reason at all! Some of the users that got tipped got angry and some got curious about Bitcoin.


I really hope so. I'm someone who is scared of flying, but would happily go on board an airship for some reason.


If you believe strongly in internet freedom and that drugs should be decriminalised / the drugs war is a terrible abomination, you probably think he's more or less a good guy. I think there's simply a large overlap in these two groups. It's somewhat internet related at any rate; the fact that he was found at all could be considered a statement that true freedom of speech may not exist.

(I'm pretty sure Silk Road never allowed assassination, and the similar claims against him personally seem quite dubious and designed to shape opinion.)


What's dubious about the murder claims? To believe that they're false, don't you have to believe that the prosecution literally falsified evidence?

Overcharging is one thing. Fabricating evidence, though? The risk/reward doesn't add up here.


I believe the prosecution believes Ross intended to pay for an assassination. But that's about it.

Without a murder victim it's pretty hard to prove murder. AFAIK there's no record of anyone with the name of the supposed victim, much less a body.


[deleted]


> Murder is bad, yes, but weighing these kinds of things is an intractable philosophical problem.

Not at all. Blackmail does not justify murder. It's not an "intractable philosophical problem" at all.

Note well: This does not justify blackmail, or say that it's not bad. Blackmail is evil. Murder is more evil.


Oh no the US government wouldn't lie or fake anything to accomplish their task at hand.


I don't think you read the whole comment to which you just replied.


Roll on crypto-anarchy.


It reads like a character assassination. A very negative interpretation for no particular reason, and a highly incredulous and begrudging perspective of the extreme introverted or loner character.

A truly awful article.


> It doesn't just kill physical pain like ibuprofen, it also kills psychological pain, emotional pain and the pain caused by social phobias.

Huh. I've tried quite a few different meds in the search for a chemical cure for social phobia, and always, somebody eventually suggests opiates as the only thing that will truly act as an "off" switch. (Accompanied by the usual dire warnings.)

I don't think I'll ever risk it though. But I can see why some people do. I wish the pain killing component could be separated from the addictive part.

That reddit link was a very interesting read.


>Huh. I've tried quite a few different meds in the search for a chemical cure for social phobia, and always, somebody eventually suggests opiates as the only thing that will truly act as an "off" switch. (Accompanied by the usual dire warnings.)

I've gone from mild social anxiety to serene confidence in social settings. No drugs.

What helped was treating it as a skill like any other. I was anxious because frankly, I sucked at social interactions. I didn't know how to make small talk, eye contact, and the very fact that I worried about how I was doing made people enjoy talking with me less.

So one by one I identified skills I lacked, and worked to acquire them in small, incremental steps.

For instance, talking to strangers. Start by asking a stranger the time. Then do it a few times. Notice that everything goes well. Once you've done that a few times, you've now got that as a skill.

Interacting with strangers. When you're at a store, make a comment to the cashier about something in the environment. They'll respond. Then you respond with something. Note how they react. Do this a bunch of times and it'll become natural.

Etc, etc. Look at people who are good at social interactions. What are they doing differently? What skills can be isolated and learned?

Anxiety itself can be approached laterally, with meditation. I don't recommend this route, but what worked for me was a major health crisis that forced me to confront death and loss. After that, social difficulties paled in comparison, and I'm not afraid of any social interactions anymore. Mindfulness was what let me get through that time of trouble by growing, rather than shrinking into misery.

What's good about social difficulties is that they are very easy to practice. All around you every day are thousands of opportunities to interact with others. If a skill can be practice, and you can get feedback, then that skill can be learned.


Yep. While Im sure there are a lot of people with medical issues that make them become socially inept, I think that social skills in general are just that: skills. You can't start programming like a pro from day one, it takes years of effort. And so does this skill.


Yes, Opiates can, amongst other things, Make you feel strong and confident, a state of mind free of social phobia. Opiates can also have quite a lot of side effects, such as a drunken, drowsy feeling, nausea etc.

There are drugs that may what you want. MDMA in particular can really reduce social phobia significantly. In some cases MDMA can even cure social Phobia. It does have side effects too. Amphetamines also lower inhibitions, as well as stimulate dialogue.

I believe addiction potential is more closely related to your reason for doing the drug and your economic status. If you are doing a drug to escape from a bad situation for example, you are likely to become dependent.


When under the influence of MDMA my social phobia completely vanished, in fact it turned me into the Bizarro version of myself, I became the life of the party. It's no way a long term solution, but I recommend taking MDMA one or two times in your life, as it has a "psychedelic life changing effect", the first couple of times you take it, it seems to hit a reset button on your brain, changing your perceptive on life.

Amphetamines in my experience are superior to opiates for social phobia as well as providing cognitive enhancement, but they come with more side effects. They're psychologically addictive, if you stop taking them, you're in a worst place then you started, tired, anxiety, depression,..etc. Amphetamines are also hard on your body, can cause psychosis, paranoia, delusions, mania, can completely change your personality. Amphetamine psychosis is the worst thing I've experienced in life, it's equivalent of experiencing severe schizophrenia, blurring the line between reality and hallucinations.


I read a series of anecdotal reports about someone who tried to treat his social anxiety by misting an aqueous solution of oxytocin into his nasal cavity.

Reportedly, it worked beyond expectations once the effective dose was found, but it only lasted for about 10-15 minutes. So he used it before entering a social situation, it lasted long enough to break the ice, and then it stopped working.

While the experiment was to test a single drug, if the initial spray of oxytocin were combined with MDMA, the guy probably could have felt almost like a normal person for the whole evening.


heya, just as a personal message, and not knowing your situation at all, I just want to encourage you to be creative and practice going from social anxiety to typical amounts of social comfort without meds... There are dozens of techniques out there, so give them all a try, from meditation to exercise, encouraging youtube videos, to diet changes, etc. Above all, don't be afraid to make mistakes... it's rather a trap for many of us to cease taking the small risks that lead to mistakes once we attain a niveau of success, but small mistakes are the propulsion that maintains that success.

For example, I've been huffing and puffing about learning Javascript since it first came out, mocking it, only seeing the bad sides. Then I got stuck in the loop of hoping it would go away and trying to rationalize not knowing it. When I started to come around, I felt embarrassed because I knew my code would be baby code and I would do lots of dumb things. But I'm pressing forward, trying to modify mapHighlight to do what I need it to do and I no longer give a shit about haters.

Yes, maybe someday people will make fun of me, but by that time, I'll be skilled enough that I'll have thicker skin. When you take the long view, you see that people mocking you is just a test to see where you are. In the case of bullying, it goes too far, but in general, testing one another to see if we're still emotionally sensitive to our failures from long ago is part of how human social bonding works. And fear of not being able to stand up to the test can motivate us to take those chances, write that crappy JS code, embarrass ourselves a little bit in front of our co-workers or potential mates.

And finally, most people are astonishingly forgiving and forgetful. Much more than we deserve. Every now and then you'll have that psycho (a trope the media and movies love to push to keep everyone in fear and anxiety) who remembers some slight for his entire life and uses it to levy revenge on someone, but in actual life, no one simply has the energy and desire to sustain a revenge campaign. They're too busy living their own lives. No one cares if I wrote some sloppy C code in 2004 and in 2024, no one will care if my JS is crummy now. And even if someone says anything to me then, it will just be a big joke in the past to me.

So that's my spiel, friend. If you want any more encouragement, it's $400/hour :)


Thanks for the message. To the others too, who commented.


> CloudFlare does not actively block visitors who use the Tor network... ...Yet all visitors who use the Tor network are blocked. There's a certain contradiction here. (Yes, I know what they mean, but the end result remains the same.)

I've often had problems when using a VPN too.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search:

HN For You