That was one car. The thing with hacking is that it's incredibly scalable. Imagine a million cars going haywire at the same time. It could be worse than being hit by a nuke, and it could be dropped by a single talented extremist.
The guy seems pretty earnest about this, seems like it is literally his first blog post.
It would not shock me in the least if people work in an org where they say they are "going agile", takes them through training where some Scrum Salesman conflates agile with scrum, leading to observations like "agile doesn't deal with change fast enough"
Honestly, we need a new word for it at this point.
Question: unless you are an anti-AI advocate, why does this matter? Why are we raising pitchforks over this? We routinely sign terms that allow product managers to analyze how we use a product and even use data for aggregation of trends.
Yes, an opt out would be nice, but what bad outcome for anyone personally comes of this?
Biggest problem with the pricing is that you are selling an expensive tool to cheap bastards that tend to be in your ICP.
Idea: sell this with a course to idiots and call it "how to be nerd rich", and then create the OnlyFans of Finance by letting said idiots subscribe for 5 dollars a month + streaming fee to the kinds of nerds you are marketing this to now.
I offer you this amazing plan at a 0 basis point equity stake. Deal?
More of an experiment, but thinking as the AI gets better, and assuming Open AI isn't reading things from the API itself, could be used to vet for security or give other kinds of stylistic feedback...
... once the AI gets better, might even offer some refactoring tips in its response.
I'd pay for stackoverflow if it wasn't for the "but aktually, instead of $thingINeed, you should use my $shittyOpenSourceProjectWith5Downloads" low quality crap.
I pay for content where quality is high. Stackoverflow is hit or miss, Medium is mostly garbage. Substack hits well, I pay for a ton of those and prefer that authors get paid well to do what they do.
