I would say there’s a difference between cognitive load and visual clutter. One of the problems I have with the visual studio UI is that it tries to be everyone’s everything…all at once. I much prefer the searchable command bar in VSCode because everything I need is just a hot key and a couple key strokes away but when I’m just using the editor I don’t have to sacrifice space or deal with sifting through icons to get to the only ones I need 90% of the time. That being said presumably the features are still there just hidden under a menu item or something.

Ultimately it comes down to personal preference but I’ve basically gotten to the point where when I’m actually writing code I use VSCode and when I need access to more advanced tooling, or have to deal with some of our legacy build systems, I pop into visual studio proper. I think I’m just a bit more use to some of that dev tooling being outside of the editor but I would really love some bigger investments in the .NET dev tooling in VSCode and the .NET CLI so I can have an editor that’s just an editor most of the time and still be able to take advantage of the great debugger and everything else VS provides.

I’m dealing with the opposite experience right now. I work at a big tech company and lately we’ve been working closely with a data science team. I’m desperate for some guidance on what sort of data pipeline and practices we can set up for them and have a hard time getting back anything but “can you export some rows as a csv”. Which is actually easier said than done considering data compliance policies and what not. Maybe there’s a good reason but it gets a bit frustrating and I can’t imagine it’s not slowing them down as well.

My concern is this could probably be a major liability. Strapping all your employees to electric roller skates that make them move faster seems like it could be a recipe for disaster if someone takes a spill at high speed. Especially since a jury would take one look at those things and see something closer to x games equipment than like “enterprise mobility device”.

7mph isn't exactly a 'high speed' and a 3 meter breaking distance is better than running

It's a little faster than a jog, it would be a pretty good tackle and if the other person landed wrong, game over. With running at least you can juke out of the way laterally.

I don’t think so. The climate change stunts didn’t actually destroy anything as they only glued themselves/threw soup on the glass coverings. If they were really looking at it they’d see the different between that and this sort of irreversible damage.

From your link:

"Like the other targeted artworks, the painting was not damaged by the stunt"

Unless you're referring to the 1914 vandalism the article mentions.

The article you linked to doesn't support your claim. It mentions 3 recent attacks, and all the paintings (Leonardo, Van Gogh, Vermeer) were apparently protected by glass and not damaged.

Both of these read like a person bullshitting and trying to reach a sentence minimum on a short answer prompt in high school to me.

Which is how I often feel reading comments on HN to begin with.

Is this really such a bad thing? Following technical walk throughs are the sort of thing that get people interested in the kind of education that is more likely to protect them and even make them someone who “knows what they’re doing.” Most of the people I know who got interested in tech didn’t do so from some Apple approved stem app, it was from this sort of independent exploration to get something they want. These arguments start to feel like prohibition over education, and in a lot of ways just plain technocratic.

I own a Tesla and I don’t see being able to own another ev unless you’re willing to not go on road trips and always have a garage or other reliable location with a wall charger. I think that they’ll dominate as commuter cars in large cities where driving is infrequent but I couldn’t see using one of those as a primary car outside of that. I’m mostly familiar with Teslas infrastructure so maybe someone else can speak to non-Tesla charging infra. It’s possibly better than I think.

> I think that they’ll dominate as commuter cars in large cities where driving is infrequent.

And this is turn will lead to expanding their charging network, and then Tesla is in real trouble. It seems inevitable at this point, but we'll see.

Congress just needs to mandate they all use usb-c

i mean, i think most people will have one gas powered long distance car and one electric local car. Really, how often do you go on road trips? For me this year, it was 4-5.

I don’t get the cult thing. I encounter way more people who hate musk, often times irrationally than I do big time supporters. I’ve seen plenty of positive takes on him but not people fawning over him. Maybe it’s because I don’t use Twitter and that’s where they’re found but at least the platforms I’m on are dominated by people calling him a muskrat and stuff. Is this anyone else’s experience?

> I don’t get the cult thing. I encounter way more people who hate musk, often times irrationally than I do big time supporters

I encounter way more people who hate scientology than people who praise it, that seems consistent with the cult label.

I'd be curious to know some of the "irrational" reasons people dislike Musk, I think people's dislike of him is pretty understandable: he's a dishonest businessman and a partisan troll.

I have no doubt that most people, let alone people who have accumulated that kind of wealth have done plenty to deserve some ire. It’s the focus on him that can make it seem irrational and like it’s more because he’s a loud mouth. There are a lot more businessmen doing substantively worse things for the world that don’t catch an ounce of hate. For me that looks a little superficial and does resemble something closer to hating a pop culture icon.

> There are a lot more businessmen doing substantively worse things for the world that don’t catch an ounce of hate

I'm certain nobody likes those vaguely described bad things and would agree those "substantively worse" things are worse. So what? The topic is Elon and thus we see people's reaction to Elon.

> I don’t get the cult thing. I encounter way more people who hate musk, often times irrationally than I do big time supporters.

These things are not connected, it actually makes no sense to say that. I know many more Musk haters than fans but at least 2 of the fans I know are definitely into the Musk-cult where they believe everything Musk does is great, that he has no flaws and any perceived flaw is just a tactic for him to get even further. They really do subscribe to the Musk 4D-5D chess stuff.

That's a cult behaviour, they are just into the personality of Elon Musk with no regards to his actions. The successful outcomes of Musk validates, to them, anything he does, like he is an infallible demi-God.

That's the cult thing.

Really not sure why you are conflating with how many hate or love him, there's no connection to that, at all.

That’s my whole point though. That I don’t encounter those people and my only exposure to the cult is people who hate him/it talking about it. You’re even telling me it’s a much smaller group than implied by all the references to it. I don’t know what is so confusing about that?

I used to think I hate Musk, then I realised I can't stand the fanboys who keep repeating talking points without possibility of engagement(you can't reason with those) and have no problem with Musk and I actually appreciate his way of thinking and it's worth listening to.

Musk lost quite of non-fanboy supporters though, over they years he did things that not everyone can stomach. No one forgot his pedo guy accusation for the diver who saved the kids from a cave in Thailand.

It's sample bias :)

Unfortunately, it became not just politicized but partisan. Republicans 'like' him and Democrats do not.

A long time Elon hater here. It is very infuriating to see this guy do anything and people cheering him on. Everything he does is more infuriating then the last, and I can’t help hating him more and more every day. I think this is a very human feeling. I also think it is very healthy, we should hate people that hold so much power through their wealth. We can’t elect him out or anything, the only thing we can do is hate.

This sounds extremely unhealthy.

> I also think it is very healthy, we should hate people that hold so much power through their wealth.

War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, hate is healthy?

How is it "healthy"? Sitting there hating some random person you don't know "more and more everyday"? That sounds like someone who needs therapy or, at least, a new hobby.

This doesn’t seem right. I would think that the SEC would be more interested in his Twitter account if he actually owned the company. If anything it leads to more scrutiny right?

I mean are you suggesting no more jokes, parodies, or satire lest a journalist take it seriously? That would practically require a complete self censor on all fiction. I could just easily tweet a blurb from a Sci-fi novel and risk someone, somewhere, misinterpreting it. Also a prank has the intent to mislead which the poster didn’t. Don’t mean to sound inflammatory but the humorless world that would be sounds a lot more miserable than living in the mess it seeks to remedy.