For the best experience on desktop, install the Chrome extension to track your reading on news.ycombinator.com
Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | history | gos9's commentsregister

And if you put teach a med student the same thing, they’ll also tell people it’s real.

What’s the point?


Hopefully a med student would notice that the paper explicitly says multiple times it’s fake.

I DID VOTE FOR ADVANCING AMERICAN INTERESTS, DIDN’T YOU?

I don’t understand why they’re catching any flak here lol if you want to use the frontier model more then pay for it?

Graceful handling from Anthropic


>Graceful handling from Anthropic

Less than 24 hours notice and on a holiday weekend


The flak is basically variations of "but I want it cheaper!" whining. The hysterics, the whiny "I'm taking my ball and going home!" nonsense, and so on, is just a wrapper around that entitlement.

The API is there. It's straightforward and easy to use. But these users want to piss in the well, tragedy of the commons style.


exactly! they actually chose the better approach rather than just locking us out

Really? Posting AI generated Reddit post with no sources or anything?

The link mentions the CVE, here's the link https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33579

Thanks! We've changed the top URL to that from https://old.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/1sbdw29/if_youre_..., but I'll put the latter in the toptext.

if would be good if we could have the submission including this link at the top

The CVE seems to be real.

Money is fungible.

Yeah let’s screen every kid and his 172 because rich people bad!

iPhone: clicking power button five times in quick succession locks down to password access only.


I, for one, am not publishing my “apps” for others to use because my “apps” make me money


Congratulations, your router now costs $700!


Customers notice higher prices at time of purchase a lot more than they notice a lack of future security updates, so good luck selling them for that price when someone else just puts an existing open source firmware on the existing hardware and sells it for the existing price.


Unpalatable preemption is generally better than reentry vehicles coming down your chimney.


The problem there is you can't prove anything would have come down the chimney if the preemption is successful, so people will still be unhappy.


I agree, but some of them are more obvious.

Like not giving 100 billion dollars to someone who actively wants to kill you.


A thought experiment: would the world be a better place if the US had preemptively attacked the USSR in the 50s or early 60s when it was possible to do without more than “get[ting] our hair mussed” as General Turgidson put it?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search:

HN For You