> Today we launched heartbeats in Codex: automations that maintain context inside a single thread over time.

https://x.com/pashmerepat/status/2044836560147984461

Thanks!

This is the final video created by the author: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YY-M5bxTY28

s/people/cpus/

Technically correct title would be: s/Kernel into/Kernel Git History into/

    Pgit: I Imported the Linux Kernel Git History into PostgreSQL

Wow that has a very different meaning from what I thought.

Thank you for making it open source!

Submitted a PR to prevent its installation on macos versions older than Tahoe(26), since I was able to install it on my older macos 15, but it aborted on execution.

https://github.com/Arthur-Ficial/homebrew-tap/pull/1

Firefox is my default, no matter where I go. I use Firefox even on my family members' laptops, even though the Chrome is pretty much always open on their machines. Time and time again I've shown that Firefox is a better choice compared to Chrome when it comes to flexibility and privacy.

That's most likely because they don't support mobile/small-form-factor altogether.

Oh, but AI has made the cost of development so low! It doesn't cost much to do cross-browser tests anymore. /s :-)

Well, it never cost much. For the most part you just need to install it into your test framework.

The problem is that the value of doing it is essentially none.

This isn’t true. Firefox users get really salty about this. They really will drop your product.

Absolutely. I will refuse to do business with anyone who is hostile to the open web.

That's a great suggestion! I used the 'User-Agent Switcher' add-on [1] and that seems to have done the trick for both the websites I reported above. (edit: I chose the option 'Windows / Chrome 146' in the add-on's UI).

As someone else said here, we should probably chalk it up to laziness on developers' part; maybe there's more to it, but I'll take that explanation and move on :-)

[1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/uaswitcher/

> we should probably chalk it up to laziness on developers' part

Also, developers at many companies don't own their time. They're given a certain amount per feature that they didn't estimate themselves, and the company doesn't give them time to fix Firefox specific bugs because it would cost them more than the user's monetary value is worth compared to other features or bugs.

Please use it only for lazy dev website, as it hides the global usage of Firefox