Article mentions 2016 somewhere. They explain a bit on top of that, with more depth ... at least my rough take on this

Well, I guess the truth is, personal data of EU and US citizens is sent in secret to european agencies all the time. Such institutions are all exempt from GDPR.

EU and member state institutions and agencies are not universally exempt.

There are some specific justifications that are scoped to government use only, in areas such as law enforcement or collection of statistics. But agencies still need to implement the law, document the specific requirements for any type of data they collect, observe time limits on retention, produce transparency reports, and so on.

We can't trust the intelligence agencies in the U.S., China, Russia, Australia, or Britain but of course the EU's agencies are trustworthy. After all, everyone knows there's nothing more effective than a European court and nobody more honest than European bureaucrats.

there are strong fundamentals. maybe they're not strong for you, but hey, that's why there is a market. nobody forces you to believe in it...

CoCalc isn't so famous for latex editing, but it has a proper Linux terminal with pandoc. That allows you to automate some tasks, etc.

the issue could be that they signal bip91, it's going to be activated, but they aren't running the actual code for rejecting the non segwit blocks

which continent and fiat currency?

Asia/INR

GCE's Nearline maybe?

This isn't an encyclopedia, it's an informal messaging board. If you want citations that badly, use your old pal Google and go find them.

Also, one word posts will almost always get downvotes unless you're answering a question that can reasonably be answered with only one word.

this is all an estimate. it's comprised of trading (to and from exchanges), sure, but also mining rewards, etc. there are some orgs analyzing the data, e.g. www.chainalysis.com

no, this ML level still statistical inference. next step is about structure and generalization.