For the best experience on desktop, install the Chrome extension to track your reading on news.ycombinator.com
Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | history | hn_acker's commentsregister

The full title is:

> Cryptocurrency industry is on track to surpass 2024 spending on Texas midterm races


Cory Doctorow argued against using copyright law as a substitute for privacy law or labor law [1], and I argue the same for location privacy. Copyright law already gets abused enough in contexts that indisputably involve copying of creative work. I do not want to stretch copyright law into location/movement privacy, where nonconsensual recording of location/movement does not necessarily copy something created by the person whose location was tracked. At least in the US, copyright comes into existence when creative expression is recorded in a tangible medium (such as your device's RAM, because outside of my beloved meme world you cannot download more RAM), and the copyright belongs to whoever did the recording. If an app on your phone records your location, was it you who recorded it? Was it the phone maker who recorded it? Was it the app maker who recorded it? Keep in mind, maybe you didn't install the app, or maybe you weren't aware that the app would track your location when you first installed it.

[1] https://pluralistic.net/2023/10/21/the-internets-original-si...


The original title is:

> AGPLv3§7¶4 Empowers Users to Thwart Badgeware


The original title is:

> 438 Experts Said Age Verification Is Dangerous. Legislators Are Moving Forward With It Anyway.


The original title is:

> Texas Tech System leader cancels academic programs “centered on” sexual orientation, gender identity


The original title is:

> With Opinions Like This, Congress Doesn’t Need to Repeal Section 230–Massachusetts v. Meta


The original title is:

> AI And Cybersecurity: A Glass Half-Empty/Half-Full Proposition, Where The Glass Is Holding Nitroglycerin


The lesson of this story is to avoid making more DMCA-like opportunities for legal abuse:

> This is why those of us who spend our time in the weeds of internet law won’t shut up about how legal liability systems are structured. The DMCA’s notice-and-takedown framework already gives bad actors a weapon to suppress speech. You don’t need a legitimate copyright claim. You don’t even need a coherent one. You just need to file the paperwork and wait for an automated system to do its thing.

> And every time someone proposes weakening Section 230, or creating new obligations for platforms to proactively police third-party content, or imposing liability for hosting material that someone claims is harmful — they are, whether they realize it or not, proposing to hand bad actors this same kind of weapon in a dozen new calibers. The DMCA is the version of this we already have, and we can see plainly how it gets abused. We should be fixing the current system, and punishing the widespread abuses, rather than spreading that same broken incentive structure to every other area of online speech.


The original title is:

> Someone Filed a Bogus DMCA Notice to Kill a Story About A Sketchy SEO Firm. It Worked — Briefly.


> Does Zuckerberg have some kind of clinical condition where he just can't imagine how other people might see him?

Cory Doctorow describes Mark Zuckerberg's and Elon Musk's attitude toward other people as billionaire solipsism [1].

[1] https://pluralistic.net/2026/01/05/fisher-price-steering-whe...


Good writing. thanks for sharing.

Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search:

HN For You