Return will still need to be verified by the taxpayer in either case.

Great point on how significant perspective is.

And on how willful misinterpretation of an analogy isn't actually a point against the analogy

There's no misinterpretation here.

It's a strawman

Previous discussion, with lots of comments:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9605733

Except for package management.

Don't agree. Self contained app bundles are great. I use homebrew for some stuff and dependencies are a PITA. E.g. multiple incompatible Python versions.

The kernel is not the problem with Windows on medical devices.

Looking forward to trying Python 3.5, it's in the repo.

Yeah, I cringed when I read that. Just what we need another excuse to keep from sharing profits with the builders of your product.

Why are you sharing your salary with new companies? a flexible jump number makes more sense.

Interesting, what is it implemented in? Seems to be Java related somehow. And there's a client and server?

If you click on the red bar under the repository description you can see what is the main programming language for the repository which is clojure.