You really think investors like sequoia and a16z are dumb enough to fall for Elon hyping things up? They know who he is and They’ve seen him operate at levels basically no other entrepreneur can snd are betting on that

> You really think investors like sequoia and a16z are dumb enough to fall for Elon hyping things up?

a16z invested $350 in Adam Neumann's real estate venture - after WeWork. VCs will absolutely knowingly invest on hype if they think it's going to last long enough for them to cash out with great returns.

SBF

Elon’s created multiple 100B companies

This is the second 20B company he created. Unfortunately the other one is Twitter.

But that doesn’t mean investors can’t be stupid

Seems decent enough for boilerplate. But if my code is incorrect, won’t an LLM generated a test for incorrect code?

Potentially, but if you wrote a test for your incorrect code wouldn't you do the same?

In the end I think the important part is not giving tests more trust than they deserve. If you fix the incorrect code and break a test you should give your change a closer look, but also give the test a closer look before you decide which needs to be fixed.

Depends on how you write tests. If you're writing tests by looking at the code you wrote and just asserting that it behaves as written, then yeah. If you're writing tests that assert that your code conforms to a predefined specification, then the tests could be the thing that helps you uncover the bugs.