For the best experience on desktop, install the Chrome extension to track your reading on news.ycombinator.com
Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | history | more john37386's commentsregister

Was the vuln known since March 2021?


You are talking about this? https://github.com/nice0e3/log4j_POC

No. That was another vulnerability which was for an older version of log4j, end of life 2015. https://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2019-17571/


This is a classic in America when calling Europe or International.

The dial out in corporate, usually you used 9. Then you google how to dial in Europe because the numbers are not natural. Google mentions dial 11 + country code + phone number.

So people hit 9 to dial out, then 11 to dial in Europe. Instantly you hear: Emergency 911, is this an emergency?

The dialer is like: no I'm trying to call Europe.


Wikipedia claims you should dial 011, so does that mean those people should have correctly dialled 9011?


9+11 specifically. Yes, a plus sign. 0 is also supposed to be mapped to plus or passed on when dialing external for compatibility reasons.


International number dialing is confusing as hell. I've got a BSEE and law degree and I can't figure it out 80% of the time.


No, 9011 is correct. "011", the international exit code for calling from the US, is what the + gets mapped to in a number such as "+49 xxx". It is followed by the destination country code (which starts with a 3 or 4 for Europe [1]), and then the local number. So for example, to call a number in Germany from a PBX in the US:

9-011-49-(German number) [3]

For long-distance domestic, the national trunk prefix should be used instead. For the US, this is 1 (unrelated to the US country code, which is also 1):

9-1-(10-digit US number)

For local calls, you do not need the trunk prefix, so you would dial:

9-(7-digit US number)

However, no US (or North American) area code nor central office code starts with a 1 [4]. So even in the above two cases, the sequence "911" should never occur.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_international_call_pre...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_country_calling_codes#...

[3] https://dcloud-cms.cisco.com/help/outbound_dial_patterns

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Numbering_Plan#...


Which one of the 2 had a bigger revenue impact on Amazon?

1. That fine mention in this article 2. The outage that happened in AWS US-East-1 region earlier this week


Revenue? The fine. Reputation? The outage.

Companies who host on AWS don't care that the retail arm abuses its market position, they care about reliability.


The fine, certainly


If us-east-1 going down for about 24 hours costs Amazon $1.3+ billion, wouldn't that make the yearly revenue of that region something like $475 billion? I think that's like AWS and Amazon yearly revenues put together.


the cost of downtime can be a lot higher than the revenue for the same time in "uptime".

some SLA's include extra compensation. there is reputation damage, ie lost future sales. perhaps also extra costs were made to resolve things.


I still have my doubts about 24 hours of reduced performance on us-east-1 being so costly that it's equivalent to 1% of yearly Amazon revenue. I know that we run some services on us-east-1 and they never completely stopped working during the downtime, so it wasn't a complete region failure.


>there is reputation damage, ie lost future sales.

hard to estimate those though.


Amazon is not profitable. AWS is.


Amazon is profitable as well, very low margin compared to AWS but still profitable.

If you see the 2020 numbers Amazon has made 21.33B (on 386B revenue). AWS business in 2020 has generated 13.5 of that (with a 45B revenue)


Parent is talking about revenue not earnings.


How will it work? Is it a kind of special trophy that will gain value over time as people win that NFT trophies over and over again? Who won it, when and how will be track in that blockchain? I'm curious and wondering if some people could explain to me like I'm 5 years old


which they copied Facebook outages (former Meta)


You didn't understand the joke. GCP was born by Google copying AWS.


You can see the glass half full or half empty. I see it half full.


Ubisoft is adding NFT in its new games. Ubisoft is a real company producing real games with real players all around the world.

https://www.theverge.com/2021/12/7/22822410/ubisoft-nfts-qua...


Is this just protifing on a topical craze or does this have staying power? What experience does in-game NFTs offer to players that they otherwise cannot find in traditional database backed assets?


> Is this just protifing on a topical craze

Of course.

> What experience does in-game NFTs offer to players

The warm glow of feeling they're the trendiest kids.


And literally every single thing they are doing could be achieved with a simple database shared across games, as they already do. The only thing NFTs achieve here is just being used for marketing.

Yes, it's a "real" use in a "real" company, but that's like trying to argue that Bitcoins are useful and totally absolutely not a scam because a few real world companies decided to accept them as payment. Like, "sure, wink wink".


But is it actually adding anything? Even the article says what they are doing (reselling digital goods) doesn't require any blockchain technology at all.


It does make the ability to resell inalienable.

Of course it's worthless when the game will be shut down in only a few years.


Sort of. You can sell it but Ubi can just as easily blacklist any ID it feels like, preventing you from actually using anything you bought.

Which will probably happen the first time some high profile streamer gets scammed out of his special shirt or whatever.


I'm not surprised - people want to buy them, so they'll happily sell them.


First fastly, then facebook, now AWS us east. Who's next? Global Google outage?


imdb seems down too and returning 503. Is it related? Here is the output. Kind of funny.

D'oh!

Error 503

We're sorry, something went wrong.

Please try again...wait...wait...yep, try reload/refresh now.

But if you are seeing this again, please report it here.

Please explain which page you were at and where on it that you clicked

Thank you!


IMDB belongs to Amazon, so likely on AWS too.

This also confirms it: https://downdetector.com/status/imdb/


TIL Amazon owns IMDB


Yeah, I was also surprised when I learned this. Another surprising thing is that they own it since 1998.


And it was all in Perl up until a few years ago (rewritten in Java).


Explains why nobody else has a feature similar to the "X-ray" thing in Prime video.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search:

HN For You