Then we can compare brave and firefox in terms of speed. I don’t see any noticeable performance difference (I use both on linux and macos)

Then ... maybe have a look at some numbers:

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Firefox-Chrome-109-Benchmarks

And sadly it can be worse, with my quite complex app, that I absolutely did not tailor for chrome, but gone out of my way to also support FF - the result is that chrome is just 3x faster.

Thank you, never looked at these. The benchmarks show a big margin, but still, I use both daily and do not notice such a gap

I wish tab groups to be implemented natively. Or that extensions can manage the tab bar instead of using a sidebar. That’s the best experience we can get so far, but it does not feel right to me.

It is more or less this. But after two conventional disputes, the alleged copyright holder cannot just claim it again. They need to go into the DMCA legal process - as so far this was just YouTube backed policy. Once a DMCA takedown received a counter-notification (disputing it), the alleged copyright owner has to either file a lawsuit, or just back out. They won’t be able to either claim the content or take it down again (unless they use shady techniques, which could get them in trouble). In a vast majority of cases, they won’t file a lawsuit, even more in this specific case of a very short excerpt, which could fall into fair use anyway.

I had the tune Crimond claimed by the same party three times (on three different performances).

The claim could be audiovisual or audio only, and might be for the whole video or just a few short segments. The claim might also apply different policies based on territories (public domain in the US does not imply it is public domain worldwide). If you are sure about it, then dispute the claim, and dispute the next one if necessary, even if that’s under DMCA. Then all they can do is file a lawsuit, which they won’t do. Full disclosure: I worked with contentID for the past 10 years.