I studied CS and I got past my "intro to stats" class with only a passing familiarity with the subject and no deep understanding (aside from the probability aspects of the course).
The professor was very poor overall. I was able to cram enough to do well, but I retained very little after the final. I would love a deep understanding built from the foundations-- the coursework we had was a lot more obtuse and "take my word for it".
In a sense, I felt I got a better foundation for statistics from a freshman sociology class than from the Math professor.
That would have been cool. Stats wasn't required for us, but if it would have been Statistical Analysis of Computer Systems(or programs, or whatever), I would have signed up for it anyway.
I heard the stats class offered where I went to school was a joke so I didn't pursue it optionally. I'm sure it's different depending on your university.
Also, my school was not renowned for any sciences.
I once listened to a stats professor bemoaning that he had to teach stats to various groups of students in their first year when they didn't know enough about their own subjects for him to use any relevant examples.
Since stats on it's own can be a bit abstract that's a double whammy.
By "intro to stats" do you mean the calc-based stats class that most people in CS take? I'd hardly call that an intro class considering you need to complete Calc I & II before enrolling.
Like many things, Stats is a vast field. Would you call a class about the basics of groups and rings anything other than an intro to abstract algebra, even though most places require both calculus and a fair amount of mathematical background?
This is sort of Zed's point. It is an intro class into a field with a great deal of depth. All you can do in one undergraduate semester is touch on a few of the most important parts.
The professor was very poor overall. I was able to cram enough to do well, but I retained very little after the final. I would love a deep understanding built from the foundations-- the coursework we had was a lot more obtuse and "take my word for it".
In a sense, I felt I got a better foundation for statistics from a freshman sociology class than from the Math professor.