I think the way I and others use it is code with clause, review or bug hunt with codex. Then I pass the review back to Claude for implementation. Works well. Better than codex implementation and finds gaps versus using Claude to review itself in my opinion.

When people talk about peptides, they typically mean either (1) GLP compounds like Reta that have successful phase 3 trial data and will be approved or (2) stuff like 157 which has no evidence or plausible mechanism to work.

I’m expecting the new iPhone release this fall to be coupled with some great version of Siri/model. This could be the first reason I’ve seen to upgrade in a while (although even that I’m not sure of, as I am king of in the “always use the best model it’s worth it” camp.)

Apple has a great shot at making a highly optimized 4.5 version of this model highly tuned to the next gen iPhone, which could work great.

Feels like it is a “supply chain risk” using the same logic Anthropic was labeled such. (Note I do not think any should be a supply chain risk, but if they were being consistent)

For those curious, on openrouter this is $0.14 input and $0.40 output, or ballpark half of Gemini flash lite 3.1 (googles current cheapest current gen closed model)

Doing a bit more research, this looks like it might perform roughly as well on text tasks with modest context windows, so may be just a better cheaper option unless you need a million token window.

I believe the biggest benefit of going to space, particularly in building space stations, is making humanity focused on building a bigger pie.

This is one step towards this. But once we can build (effectively) infinite land, we will be in true abundance.

I was excited about the 1.58 bit models from a year or two ago, but the never seemed to go anywhere. Curious in particular how this scales up.

I hope it’s much longer. Bunch of 200 year olds having needed to work to 75. Crazy talk!

curious if zjit will be ready to be default over yjit next ruby release. hope so!

Not sure I buy the premise. Austin has a household $133k median income with a $435k median home price. It’s very affordable.

But, to make Austin more affordable still, you make it less expensive to build so that it’s profitable to build. Typical regulations that do this are: - Lower minimum sizing requirements - open zoning - raise height limits - make sure you don’t have unwarranted restricted fire codes (some places have elevator stairwell requirements that are insane) - make permitting easier or not required at all for some cases - no min parking requirements

Pretty sure as good as Austin is, they could easily reduce the costs by up to 30% (there are parts of the country with 50% the cost per sq ft for new construction).