I loved my RM2 but the pencil broke and without a warranty, it felt hard pressed to by another one. I replaced tips regularly, but the "tip-holding" piece shifted so it couldn't be reliably used any more. I wonder if any other folks hit this or if I just had a one-offf bad experience?
Thanks for the feedback. In the product, we'd like companies to approve/reject who they speak with (mutual for approvals), so that unsolicited communication doesn't impede operations. Thoughts?
Again, I don't think that's clear at all from your marketing pages. It ends with "The end result of all of this is more emails and messages and a harder time discerning what's significant."
It isn't clear to me if this is targeted to the business owner or the 3rd party firm. Working at a startup, I want to make choices quickly, but this seems to further obscure the relationship and deal.
Small bit of feedback on your post, you use the same screenshot when referencing how Honey's execs used to respond to customer feedback. Based on reading the post I think you intended two different screenshots.
This premise destroys the whole argument for me: "I consider this a puzzle because I think that people who go to college decide on what to major in significantly based on two factors: earning potential and whether a field is seen as high-status."
Based on my personal experience in the late 2000s, this was not true at all. People majored in CS because they liked solving the logic puzzles CS represents regardless of salary or stays
> Based on my personal experience in the late 2000s
I think this time period is a slight outlier - for our parents the dotcom bust was recent memory and a lot were discouraged from going into the field. Mostly only those who really wanted to, like for the logic puzzles you suggest, went ahead anyway.
