I’ve been wondering this as well. Could it be seedance 2?

If you have the backing off a government, I'd think ComfyUI on a seriously beefy computer would be the ideal choice so you're not reliant on a foreign company. Plus if they're getting help from the CCP, they'll have access to video generation models out of China. If the question is "could a dedicated teenager in America create a clap back video", I think the answer is no, but I not gonna bet against this hypothetical teenage either.

Pakistan, who worked with everyone to create the ceasefire, stated that Lebanon was included.

Anthropic seemed to have a choice.

Trump did not rename DoD to DoW like you confidently state to GPT. DoW is a secondary title bestowed to the DoD (as that is all the power the President has). It would take an act of congress to rename the DoD to the DoW.

Your chatgpt results are so much different than mine. Are you using thinking on the newest model on a paid account? Do you have a strong personalization prompt enabled?

Yes, people do in fact judge others for their associations.

If you don't that is fine but I imagine you would also hold the view that not posting on X shouldn't be controversial then either.

Iran stated that it needed to be. I know Israel/US said it isnt, but that isnt how a ceasefire works. All sides actually have to agree to the terms of a ceasefire to have a ceasefire.

https://www.axios.com/2026/04/08/lebanon-attacks-israel-iran...

I can't understand how it is possible that when such ceasefires are agreed there isn't a designated third party who has the signatures of both parties and can say, and prove, if it's been violated.

There is a designated third party Pakistan and they say Lebanon is part of the ceasefire.

They say it, but can they prove it? Because everyone seems to be saying a different thing. Shouldn't Pakistan be able to say "this is the document, these are the terms, these are the signatures, case closed"?

Pakistan are the mediators, why would they lie about the explicit terms of the agreement? They would immediately loose all trust if they did.

I'm not saying they're lying, I am just wondering why they don't seem to have a definitive proof of what they say- they say one thing and the US "disagrees"- why can't any of the parties just show the fucking document?

So if both sides do not agree to that request it’s not part of the ceasefire, pretty simple.

If both sides don't agree on the terms of a ceasefire you don't have a ceasefire.

1. The version of the ceasefire that you are got third hand from Twitter or American news outlets are not accurate.

2. Iranians can't read.

Which do you think is more likely?

Most likely not. I've seen Iranian sources claim that the 10 point plan is violated[1]. However I (1) do not know about Iran's government structure and (2) I can only trust other sources that I believe are trustworthy.

However I think assuming that Israel violating the ceasefire (as they have done multiple times in the past) is more reasonable than assuming a country with a ~400B GDP (similar to Hong Kong, Portugal) has leaders that "can't read".

[1] https://x.com/mb_ghalibaf/status/2041943537386958858

ChatGPT Personal Pro plan hasnt had the change yet. It is rolling out to Enterprise users first.

If you don't want to wait, the refined HN extension has had this feature for a long time, but it is device specific.

https://github.com/plibither8/refined-hacker-news

via oauth, yes.

There ToS didn’t use to say that. It does now, that is the bait and switch. FYI, openai says their sub IS a giant bucket of tokens you can use however you want.