Probably having too much fun with this, thanks

  Human: What is 3+3
  Assistant: 3+3
  Human: What does it equal
  Assistant: It is equal to the following:
  
  Assistant: It is equal to the following:
  
  Assistant: It is equal to the following:
  
  Assistant: It is equal to the following:Human: What does 3+3 equal
  Assistant: 3+3 = 4

Impressive. This is basically AGI!

    User: What is 3+3?
    Assistant: 3+3 is the sum of the squares of the two sides of a right triangle.

Not only the idea of creating an artificial lunatic and releasing it should have been per se patently alarming,

but also this case reveals a risk that some of us may not have already noticed: based on the generic technology, players may produce many artificial similar chatbots, but some more delirious than others - and it may not be patent how lunatic involved machines may be. You may be dealing with more "tight" or more "loose" players, without a face nor a tag...

--

(This said: congrats lxe for the technical effort! I am reasoning on the general scenario.)

A bit like Quarto[1] for SQL?

[1] https://quarto.org/

Almost buried the lede:

>After attempting to remove the delicious burrito from the system, we discovered that the only way to save the server was to layoff 15% of our staff. Though heartbreaking, this was the only way to prevent a complete system failure.

Still seems outrageous to me that BOM doesn't support HTTPS...

It's been pretty amazing to watch the evolution of sudoku theory over even the last two years, some truly genius work by eg Phistomofel, Aad van de Wetering, Totally Normal Cat as well as the enormous contribution of Cracking the Cryptic