For the best experience on desktop, install the Chrome extension to track your reading on news.ycombinator.com
Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | history | more qntmfred's commentsregister

it's of course possible. it wouldn't make sense, but it is certainly possible. the more important question is whether it is true. no, it is not.


it's not real you can safely ignore it


do you have any suggestions for those who want to understand what this conflict feels for a regular Israeli just trying to live

or Israelis 40 years ago today

or 75 years ago

or Palestinian Jews 100 years ago

etc


Read diaries of anyone heteronormative living in a collapsing empire.

The Israeli experience is swayed heavily by decades of supremacist propaganda which is unfortunately becoming baked into the religion. I've had a surprising number of conversations with Israelis about politics that at some point involved them mentioning Israelis being "god's chosen people."

Even Israeli progressives have to couch opposition to war in desire to get the hostages back, or they'll face incredible social blowback. Not to mention those with religious oppositions to serving in the military are propagandized as "not contributing to Israeli society," since the only valid way to do that is commit violence on behalf of the State.


A lot of Israelis who reference “God’s chosen people” aren’t claiming superiority in the way it’s often interpreted abroad. In Jewish tradition, “chosen” historically means chosen for responsibility, not privilege. The phrase “light unto the nations” captures this: it’s about modeling ethical behavior, justice, and compassion, not dominating or controlling others.

Understanding this helps separate the original ethical meaning of “chosen” from the way it’s sometimes misinterpreted in political discourse: it’s meant to be a call to moral responsibility, not a claim of inherent superiority.


> chosen” historically means chosen for responsibility, not privilege.

> moral responsibility

Yes, this is identical to how it was stated by the three separate Israelis I had this conversation with that said it exactly this way.

I ask genuinely if you understand this:

Do you see how believing that a supreme being has granted "your people" a moral responsibility could easily lead to any actions "your people" do being ipso facto "moral" by definition of the fact it's performed by "your people?"

Do you see how just the mere separation of people into "chosen by god (even just to live better)" and "not chosen by god (not responsible for living better)" can easily create a supremacist ideology?

Do you understand that, from a scientific perspective framed in sociology and anthropology, there's no such thing as a Jewish person or non Jewish person in any externally consistent definition, that the definition is only enforceable by internal justifications, and that therefore it's arbitrary who is chosen and who isn't? And therefore exploitable by supremacists? See: e.g. Whiteness; Jews are white when it's convenient, and nonwhite when not convenient, same for Italians, Irish, Catholics...

Not to mention: Hassidic Jews in Israel refuse to participate in the military. Other Israeli Jews say this is traitorous to the Jewish people, not doing their part to keep Jews safe. Some Israelis say horribly racist things about Palestinians, comparing them to animals and openly calling for their extermination. Others don't. Which Jewish people are correctly implementing the moral responsibility set forth by the Jewish god?


You’re right that claims of being “chosen” can be misused, but in classical Judaism it means chosen for personal moral responsibility, not automatic virtue or supremacy. The phrase “light unto the nations” emphasizes modeling justice, compassion, and humility through your own actions. Anyone who interprets it as justification for harming others or claiming inherent superiority is a fringe distortion, not representative of Jewish teaching.


Reminds me of the Frenchs and their "pays des droits de l'homme", although I don't believe it's been as operational as the "chosen people" in practice.


If you have read any newspaper or media publication for past 75 year, you have got their view. Or any of the several films Hollywood has produced about the subject, ever heard of Spielberg?


Here’s a good starting point for learning about the situation:

“Our Genocide” by an israeli human rights organization https://www.btselem.org/publications/202507_our_genocide

This book too:

“The 100 Years War on Palestine” by Rashid Khalidi https://www.amazon.com/Hundred-Years-War-Palestine-Coloniali...


we didn't really previously NEED to, but we still tried bc it was an interesting question. today the NEED seems more urgent


sometimes hacker news links are about doing free work for microsoft, like finding bugs in Windows and Office

sometimes hacker news links are about doing free work for microsoft, like rigorously defining AGI, because that triggers the OpenAI license-to-stock conversion now

maybe this is why microsoft makes so much fucking money. Even the New Yorker cannot stop fucking doing work for them for free.


Can you spell out more why we need it now?


To settle endless discussions like these! ;-)


Ad-free YouTube Premium is a Luxury Good


Even with premium you still can't hide suggested videos, shorts, the front page is still messy...


Have people forgotten what a bookmark is? https://www.youtube.com/feed/subscriptions

And once on a video, suggestions cannot be seen in Cinema Mode, which can be made the default. Still have the ones at the end of the video I suppose, though they show up inconsistently for me, so might be a channel creator setting.


I wish there was a way to block those floating boxes recommending additional videos, that always cover up the end of a video


I recently noticed a tiny "Hide" control (to hide these) that pops up in the top right, which is long overdue.


It’s possible with this extension: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/unhook-remove-youtu...

I use it on firefox


Which is why I pray everyday at the shrine of my 10tb 5200rpm spinning rust and yt-dlp client.


Aren't luxuries supposed to be expensive?


This question reminds me of the time Larry King interviewed Danny Pudi[1] and asked him, "What's a luxury you can't live without?"

[1] https://youtu.be/76HijAoXi6k


Lol, don't know who this guy is but that is an awesome response. Good socks, my man.


“Larry, I do ducktails”

What an icon


No, or at least not in money. An afternoon on the couch reading a good book is a luxury.


any thoughts on uuidv7 vs ulid, nanoid, etc for url-safe encodings?


ULID is the best balance imo, it's more compact, can be double clicked to select, and case-insensitive so it can be saved on macOS filesystems without conflicts.

Now someone should make a UUIDv7 -> ULID adapter lib that 1:1 translates UUIDv7 <-> ULID preserving all the timestamp resolution and randomness bits so we can use the db-level UUIDv7 support to store ULIDs.


A uuid is a 128b number with a specific structure. You can encode them in base32 if you want, there is no need for any sort of conversion scheme.


You need to convert it to perserve the timestamp info correctly so that a ULID library reading the base32 format would reproduce the same timestamp.


What I'm saying is that ULID is irrelevant and unnecessary, if you want "double clicked to select, and case-insensitive" you just encode your UUIDs in base32. They're still UUIDs.


Nah ULID guarantees some extra stuff as part of its spec beyond UUIDv7, including true sub-millisecond monotonicity and a ceiling of 7ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. You can convert to base32 to get some of the benefits but they're not exactly the same.



i guess that depends on what you mean by url-safe

uuidv7 (-) and nanoid (_-) have special characters which urlencode to themselves.

none are small enough that you want someone reading them over the phone; but from a character legibility, ulid makes more sense.


If the obsidian team did a 2 hour q&a livestream every week, I'd watch every one (or at least get the AI summary). One of my favorite pieces of software ever.


I recently had a similar experience using Libby for the first time.

An absolutely incredible piece of software. If anyone here on HN works on it, you deserve to be proud of your work.


Fully agree. Libby is awesome!


I got laid off in august 2023. I had seen it coming for a few months, as I had in the previous year been promoted to lead an engineering team for another company at the PE group I worked for and it quickly became clear they were going to consolidate the product lines at the two companies and my group's CTO lost the political battle.

I was a bit concerned at the time as the previous couple quarters had seen a LOT of tech layoffs and I had also already seen a lot of anxiety in the industry about the changing supply/demand landscape. I ended up getting a new job I was excited about in less than a month, which I was very much not expecting when I began job searching. Unfortunately I may have been too quick to jump into the first thing that came along - after 2 months of onboarding I was out of a job again, as the team lead role I was hired for suddenly didn't have a team to lead and not much use for me without one. Oh well.

I took the holidays off and figured I'd spend some time playing with all the emerging AI capabilities. I figured I'd hack on some fun stuff for a few months, see if I could build a product business around it, and go from there. I ended up building something along the lines of Windows Recall, but when Microsoft announced it in May 24 and I saw the reception, that was the end of that.

I started job searching again, but then my wife got diagnosed with cancer and I decided to extend my time off to focus on her treatment. Fortunately treatment went about as well as we could hope and this summer she went back to work again.

So I've been applying again over the last few months. Initially I focused on local jobs as I've been mostly remote since 2018 and frankly miss the office environment. I got 3 final round interviews in the first month of applying and got ghosted by all 3. That was unexpected and frustrating. And for one job, in my last interview round with a VP, he said he wanted me to come back in a few weeks to interview for a more senior role instead. Which I did, and then they ghosted me. I don't necessarily mind not getting the job (I'm awesome but hey I get there might be better fits out there for particular role requirements) but I don't get the unprofessionalism that has seemingly become so common these days.

Now I'm starting to focus on remote jobs again as well, but it's tough constantly seeing day old job posts on linkedin with 100+ applications already.

So as for coping, I'm doing alright all things considered. Definitely didn't expect to go this long without a 9-5, and I know I'm fortunate to have been able to absorb it financially. Most importantly, I'm grateful that I spent the last year+ making sure my wife was taken care of. And of course that experience really puts into perspective the importance of how we spend our days, while we still have them. I will say that I'm disappointed (with myself) I haven't been able to launch a viable business during this time, but that's how it goes sometimes. I'm looking forward to 2026.


>>seeing day old job posts on linkedin with 100+ applications already.

Don't believe for a second that these figures are real. And I recommend that you apply on the business' own site, never through Linkedin's own process.

It's great that you and your wife are healthy and in a good place! Keep going.


Dear GitHub wasn't all that long ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10904671


you can just do things


Not for all licenses.

For example, GPL has a "no-added-restrictions" clause, which allows the recipient of the software to ignore any additional restrictions added alongside the license.

> All other non-permissive additional terms are considered “further restrictions” within the meaning of section 10. If the Program as you received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that it is governed by this License along with a term that is a further restriction, you may remove that term. If a license document contains a further restriction but permits relicensing or conveying under this License, you may add to a covered work material governed by the terms of that license document, provided that the further restriction does not survive such relicensing or conveying.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search:

HN For You