In a way, yes, but not exactly. As far as I understand the idea is that gravity induces the collapse in quantum mechanics, which would be a huge conceptual change (and IMO a very satisfying solution to the measurement problem).
Moreover, according to the article this collapse does not preserve the key property of quantum mechanical time evolution: unitarity (aka "preservation of past information" aka "predictability of the future").
> The new theory allows for information to be destroyed, due to a fundamental breakdown in predictability.
With the iPad and MacBook Apple added 160 MHz support for 6E only (not on 5 GHz still, which makes sense). Did they really not do that with the new iPhone 15 Pro as well? A bit disappointing really.
Context: I was part of a company acquired by FB in 2019, worked there until Dec 2022.
It really depends, based on how independent the acquired company needs to be, and how useful it would be to have overlap with code components & engineering resources with the main monorepo.
In our case, up until Dec 2022, parts our pre-acquisition monorepo were still separate, but gradually components and workflows, such as tests and reviews, were moved into the main repo. From my awareness, we didn't even start merging into the main monorepo until more than a year after we were acquired, though of course there were exploratory efforts before.
In general, I'm pro-monorepo, it makes sense to be able to update multiple interconnected components in lockstep. For the startup, we were still in research mode, so it was less urgent to spend eng/sci/TPM to incorporate with anything on the FB monorepo side...until it was.
Overdesign is one of the worst things to do. Trying to make something fit perfectly into some obscure pattern with horrible class hierarchies.
Look at the linux kernel sources, it does not look "beautiful" to some architects but the actual ideas and patterns are simple, anyone can jump into it if they know C.
Basic features? This took c++ a long time to get this done.
I like c++ but not sure what is the point being negative about other languages would you prefer no one to try new things?
They would accept new proposals for these if you want to contribute, or just continue complaining.
