For the best experience on desktop, install the Chrome extension to track your reading on news.ycombinator.com
Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | history | searchmartin's commentsregister

In your example they still show results, in mine, they do not.


Hands up... yes, it’s fully intended to get you to click through. (I wrote it)

BUT: the underlying point is still valid, these are not sear results, that come from a search engine. These are answers, from an answer engine.

(But still made you click ;) )


There’s a screenshot example. More have been found since I wrote that piece.

Best regards, “SEO scoundrel”


Well, I run that site. It’s non commercial, doesn’t have ads, and my clients are all Fortune 50’s.

Do some research before trying to put people down, it’s unbecoming.


Here's a write up as to why they have made the changes. Was going to write it yesterday, but life got in the way:

http://webmarketingschool.com/no-twitter-did-not-just-de-ind...


Why would you not use 301 redirects or just rel=canonical?


There must be some platform issue is my best guess...


They could at least have allowed the Internet Archive in the robots.txt, since the way things stand all www.twitter.com links will be unavailable from the Wayback Machine. That will obviously be a huge loss to researchers.


(Update: the Wayback Machine will be fine, using the twitter.com/robots.txt)



Nope. No. They didn't.

What they did was some perfectly legitimate duplicate content protection.

Will write it up in a bit more detail...


I'd agree with that - on the press flaming that Apple are getting though - Im just not buying it. Really feels more like a cloud storage hack than iCloud, right?


Edit: Apple has confirmed that it was breached and celebrities were targeted. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/09/apple-confirms-c...

Some of the leaks do look like iCloud backups though. Videos don't get uploaded to Apple's "photo stream" so it would have to be an iCloud backup or, less likely, a local backup that was uploaded to Dropbox. Right now it "feels like" a lot of different leaks and leakers jumping on 4chan and demanding bitcoins for their own little dumps.


I'd welcome the YCOM analysis of whats actually happened here, but iCloud just doesnt feel like the issue...


search google for mattcutts.com - you'll see another post of mine from last year, detailing some theory ;)


Yes, I've seen you writing about it, but it was not done in the end. (at least not the link spamming that's mentioned in this article) Even worse, the article mentions "Any of those might work, but none are particularly reliable. Most actually stand a good chance of positively influencing their results instead." - which rather indicates that it's hard to do really negative SEO even if you try.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search:

HN For You