I feel like even that would fall under the umbrella of a desktop app in the context of this asine bill. they didn't say desktop apps with a GUI, just any "app" running on a desktop which I'm sure they would argue includes bash or whatever else you're running as your CLI.
Are talking about apps visible on the graphical UI desktop, or apps running on desktop computers? Because I've been relying more on laptops lately, and they're not mentioned. So the combination of laptop + cli is not covered by this law.
Right but the point is you at least need to notfiy them first and give them the chance to do something. If you're unsatified with what they've done, or lack thereof, then sure.
The point isn't a point at all, since their sister had already notified the police and given them a chance to do something. Read the article: "My sister had already had a couple of police visits about the previous incidents."
Copy written lyrics so they can't be stolen
If they are, Snap! Don't need the police
To try to save them, your voice will cease
So please, stay off my back
Or I will attack, and you don't want that
not GP but I do agree to a point that the records of Messi/CR7 at the club level are more impressive than Pele's.
Pele played all his club games in Brazil (18 seasons with Santos) and the US (2 seasons with the Cosmos) where the level of competition was far lower than the likes of the Spanish/English/French leagues (plus the Champions League) that Messi/CR7 play in.
I don't think it's as simple as that though since Messi/CR7 also play with much more talented teammates than Pele did so that factors into things as well.
> Pelé's goal ratio is almost one per match, for 20 freaking years.
Just looking at goal ratio, Messi is pretty comprable here. According to Wikipedia Pele's goal ratio is .93/match over 20 seasons while Messi's is .87/match over 17.5 seasons.
> Got "1234" as a passcode on a long-forgotten family iPad or test iPhone? Better go change it to something secure...
according to the article, I don't think this will be possible because you won't even be able to turn on Advanced Data Protection in this scenario.
"You must also update all your Apple devices to a software version that supports this feature."
Just to get the feature enabled you're going to have to go and "touch" all of the devices you're signed into and either update their OS (and also update their passcode if you're smart) or sign out of them.
> Organic Chemistry 1, 2 and 3 at NYU have always been considered challenging and “weed out”.
It seems this "weed out" culture around orgo is very much an established thing in the world of the sciences/pre-med which is a little strange to someone like me that is not in that world. How come one particular subject is used so universally to weed people out as opposed to just weeding out the bottom x% of people with lowest overall GPA's? Is orgo so much more important to scientists and medical professional compared to other subjects such as biology, anatomy, etc?
Yes it is, and extensions for Brave are installed through the Chrome Web Store, as are extensions for other chromium based browsers like Edge. There's no escaping the manifest v3 event horizon for extension developers.
Other commenters mentioned that they will continue to support MV2 and are even planning to stand up their own extension store that offers MV2 extensions after Google stops allowing them in their store.
You are not misrembering. They announced it at the beginning of this month [0][1] and have officially shut down all of their hosted instances as of about a week ago [2]
Holy hell, this blog is virtually unreadable. Article content aside, the fact that after pretty much every single paragraph there's 1-2 giant links to some other article and/or an ad is just infurianting and makes it impossible to focus. I stopped reading after the first few and will be adding this site to my blocklist.
I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought this, I actually gave up reading it halfway through because the ads fracture the content far too much - it just doesn't flow.
I likewise found this annoying. The giant link previews are especially disruptive on mobile where two in a row can literally take up most of the screen, although they're also obnoxious on the desktop.
When I first saw them I thought maybe they were ads, or there was a mistake and I ran into the end of the article early.
I liked the post, though! Geoffrey, please reconsider this citation style where you have an ellipsis and then giant link previews. I think it distracts from good content. Could similar link previews upon hover still scratch the itch that drove you to try these link previews?
Unfortunately, per Steam's TOS, you do not own anything you "purchase" on their platform. Instead you "subscribe" to access of whatever games/other content you've paid for:
...the rights to access and/or use any Content and Services accessible through Steam are referred to in this Agreement as "Subscriptions."
... The Content and Services are licensed, not sold. Your license confers no title or ownership in the Content and Services.
To me, that's their business if they want to operate that way and folks can choose to accept that and be a customer if they so desire. I think what's really wrong is that nowhere on their store pages do they use the word "Subscription" and instead they use the word "Purchase". This should not be allowed and is false advertising, plain and simple.
But also note that the limitation of liabilities section does not apply to UK, EU, Australian or New Zealand customers.
For example, the statement on Australia:
> FOR AUSTRALIAN SUBSCRIBERS, THIS SECTION 7 DOES NOT EXCLUDE, RESTRICT OR MODIFY THE APPLICATION OF ANY GUARANTEE, RIGHT OR REMEDY THAT CANNOT BE SO EXCLUDED, RESTRICTED OR MODIFIED, INCLUDING THOSE CONFERRED BY THE AUSTRALIAN CONSUMER LAW (ACL). UNDER THE ACL, GOODS COME WITH GUARANTEES INCLUDING A GUARANTEE THAT GOODS ARE OF ACCEPTABLE QUALITY. IF THERE IS A FAILURE OF THIS GUARANTEE, YOU ARE ENTITLED TO A REMEDY (WHICH MAY INCLUDE HAVING THE GOODS REPAIRED OR REPLACED OR A REFUND). IF A REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT CANNOT BE PROVIDED OR THERE IS A MAJOR FAILURE, YOU ARE ENTITLED TO A REFUND.
Which means that removing access to the purchased item, does in fact entitle you to a refund.
I understand one does not own the game as that entitles the user to additional rights. But I feel like the user should own the license and they should not be able to revoke your ability to download/play it barring they go out of business or something.
agreed, I didn't mean to imply that they did. merely that this is something that is inherent to Steam's platform meaning they as much a part of the problem as the publisher here
