End-to-end encryption only means something if you trust the endpoints.

They often also tend to call HTTPS end-to-end encryption

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/media/securing-your-origin-for-...

even Amazon Web Services:

    Benefits of using HTTPS connections:
    HTTPS provides end-to-end encryption

I wonder if that's why it's called Transport Layer Security.

The editing of the dictionary in that book is more troublesome than the surveillance state and propaganda campaigns.

Start a lemonade stand?

Trotting out fallacy names on regular basis isn't going to win you any points.

I read your piece. Your title is clickbait, and you know it.

For a bug in the LucasArts Smush codec? Why didn't you verify it was an mp4/h264 first?

Mp4 is an envelope codec, so it could be both an mp4 and an obscure codec

Not to be confused with:

https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262731423/the-idea-factory/

You're working with bits. It's turtles all the way down.

A brochure for the cult of PostgreSQL and Django by default without a compelling reason otherwise.

As opposed to the person who watched Star Trek and thought scribbling down something they saw on that counted as having vision.

Children! Children! Stop fighting. We can all get along.