For the best experience on desktop, install the Chrome extension to track your reading on news.ycombinator.com
Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | history | singpolyma3's commentsregister

Next build a nice way to use normal Makefile with rust

Seems like a supabase competitor?

That's a fair statement! I would say we are similar to supabase in that we offer a relational backend. We are different in two ways:

1. Supabase runs on VMs, so only supports 2 free projects. We built the backend to be multi-tenant, so we can give you unlimited free projects.

2. Supabase doesn't support offline mode or optimistic updates. Instant gives you a sync engine which does.


Arguing you should not write "complex" things or "formal" things becuase of poor attention spans just makes me sad about the state of literacy.

Unnecessary complex and formal writimg is just a poor writing. It is harder to write clearly and simply.

I mean it's advice from the same man who thought "delve" - a 6000 year old, monosyllabic word used by Shakespeare and Tolkien - was too complicated and should not be used.

I am not sure we should be taking him as a literary authority.


The premise of the movie is that smart people stop having kids and dumb people have lots. It's "reverse eugenics"

But it's a proven fact. Less educated people are poorer. The less educated tend to have more children. And children who grow up in poor families receive a lower quality of education.

Yes but this is not the genetic argument this is a "school system sucks" argument

In every country, if your parents are scientists, you will be in average smarter, than if your parents are peasants.

Is that because of some heritable presence/lack of intelligence or because scientists feed their children well early in life, have books in the home, and take the time to follow up on their children's education?

Woah, woah, stop right there with your facts Mr. Eugenics. /s

The ugly thing about eugenics is that someone has an artificial ideal of how people should be and then tries to enforce that. If something just happens without interference (a process), that's basically just evolution.

In general the methodology for IQ is highly questionable

> In general the methodology for IQ is highly questionable

What do you propose as a replacement?


Then you get banned

You're absolutely right. That is an em dash

You're absolutely right. They are absolutely right

Indeed. My first job was in a factory doing things that we had machines to do, but not enough of them or efficient enough. I spent the whole time dreaming of automating the factory properly.

More diagnosis for sure

... which of those do you expect Occam's razor points to?

It's like a litmus test for whether you're susceptible to Facebook boomer ragebait.

Were the indictments also ragebait? https://www.justice.gov/usao-mn/pr/first-defendant-charged-a...

Are you really so petty as to call anything not fitting your world view "ragebait"?


...not... ...fraud?

Ok. Maybe. In areas I'm familiar with fraud is so widespread as to feel like the simpler answer. But I have no context for places with medical fraud so I bow to your experience here

Absent enforcement, proceeds from fraud are invested in more fraud. Given that fraud exists in this area, the shape of the growth curve suggests fraud as a plausible driver.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search:

HN For You