that's what i feel, going to use codex more

Used it briefly, would rather using 4.6 instead. Time to get on Codex's $100 plan and downgrade Claude plan, what a disappointment.

QT does it well but the license is a maze

I wish it's that simple. Not all components are LGPL, so when you're doing LGPL and you suddenly need some must-have-but-not-LGPL component,you're in trouble.

would be nice to have cpu usage added so I have all in one?

currently I use btop which shows basic gpu load along with cpu, network, etc.

it's always the browser, each tab is at least 100MB, electronjs is also a browser. the gtk or whatever is nothing before the browser

I was a drupal user, then wordpress user, both are too complicated for my personal sites, so I used golang to build a cms with AI for my own use, easy and good enough to suit my needs. so yes, no more wordpress for me at all.

this reminds me of: https://github.com/tinyos/tinyos-main more than one decade ago

long term claude code user here, never used cursor, however based on my limited experience, it seems codex can code better than claude code.

I've been using Codex since before ChatGPT (the OG version) and CC since launch. For me personally - Claude Code with Opus/Sonnet generally has better taste, more personality in interactions, and is more willing to just do the work. Paired with skills, LSPs, linters, and hooks, it works very well. I think of the two like this:

Claude Code with Opus/Sonnet is the L7 senior engineer still gunning for promotion. Hasn't hit burnout, hasn't been ground down by terrible teams yet. Capable and willing to get their hands dirty. Codex (the harness) with GPT-5.4 or 5.3-codex is fantastic but terse. Some of the UX frustrates me. I want a visual task list. That said, Codex as a harness is phenomenal. Think of it as the senior EM / CTO-in-waiting who won't write new code without complaining and nitpicking for hours. But they'll thoroughly tear your code apart and produce a plan you can execute yourself or pass to Claude Code.

Both are great, and so is Factory Droid. Also worth checking out Compound Engineering from Every.to if you haven't.

here is example of project i worked using codex, it took 10 iterations just to get github actions right https://github.com/newbeelearn/whisper.cpp . you can see the commits made by codex. Project was quite simple it needs to modify whisper to add support for transcribing voice with start/stop keys and copy the transcription to clipboard when stopped. That's it. It performs poorly as compare to CC which gets it right in one shot.

a dumb question, is this better than qwen3.5 and I thus should switch over?

well we do need at least two powerful AI companies, so they can cross checkout each other when I use them.