For the best experience on desktop, install the Chrome extension to track your reading on news.ycombinator.com
Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | history | timcc50's commentsregister

You would need to know them personally. There are lots of big mining farms around the world, and many smaller ones. You would need to be friends with the big ones to pull anything like this off.


And people would start losing trust in the network if this was happening, thus the value of the currency would start dropping, thus all the network participants including the miners would be in a losing position in the long run, which is not what you are looking for after you have invested money in the mining equipment and the whole operation.

That's why the total "hash rate" (the computational effort spent by all the participating miners) is in direct relation to the perceived value of the currency.


Huge amount of web traffic from crypto traders. I'd imagine they will direct those people to their exchange and make the money back in trading fees.


It already is the biggest Exchange by a large margin:

https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/binances-crypto-exchange-ma...

You're telling me you think they'd drop $400 million in HOPES of just getting that back x-fold via trading fees via a convoluted Marketing scheme?

That's crazy, but hey... let me use CMC to see how many Alt's have a smaller Market cap than the recent $400 Million purchase price tag.

Edit: Forget that, that's a waste of time; I did some legwork on potential IP or exclusive deal and found this from 2 weeks ago:

> Crypto Briefing Announces Partnership Integrating Company's SIMETRI Digital Asset Ratings on CoinMarketCap

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200317005241/en/Cry...

That makes more sense, if the assumption is that institutional level investment is primed to get in and CMC's SIMETRI rating system is the seen as the most trusted way in.

Which I have serious doubts given how so many Banks and Hedge Funds already have established systems in place. Fidelity being the most notable in the US for example, but are much larger outside of the US.


They should never be there anyway, Bitcoin is a waste of time.


It's not waste of time. I think if helped progress in the hardware. It educated people on blockchain. Now there may be rigs our there for sale, which can be reused for more important things, scientific research, etc.


Maybe so, but please don't post unsubstantive comments here.


I don't care about the time, but I'm utterly horrified at the waste of resources.


Are you kidding me? VR is the best


BR, Blockchain Reality, compress your acronyms on a DLT, earn rewards to spend on virtual real estate


They need to create new regulation, not cack-handidly apply old regs to entirely different technology


The regulation is fine. It's just that it's not always easy to predict how it will be applied since the SEC behaves in some very strange ways when it comes to ICOs.

A lack of precedent makes this the biggest challenge. New regulation would have the same problems.


Why do they? There's nothing special about an ICO, other than it's "on a computer". When it comes to the concept of investing, they're not doing anything new.


Well, tokens sold on ICO mean nothing and does not represent share of the company, or anything at all. They are just vapour.

Personally i don't think that ICOs should be banned or regulated - if anything, they are frequently done by anonymous or fake identity people and cashed out using monero, anyway.

Just explain people that they are a scam, and a crime if (unlikely) caught, just like they explained about nigerian prince scam.


They're not really stealing from Ethereum but it does seem to be an issue


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search:

HN For You