This is a silly thing to say.

Such a thing can’t be enforced and it can be flipped on a dime.

You should play around with local LLMs and system prompts to experience it.

I still have a 12” Macbook, and it feels much more lighter than it actually is.

I like my MBA, but it could be shrunk. Without the wedge it’s much more easier, too.

You could give pre iOS 7 devices to grandmothers and monkeys and they could use it. That was nice.

Nowadays, I don’t know all the gestures and things you can do on an iPad despite watching every Apple Keynote.

Open source LLMs aren’t about cost foremost, but stability.

Storage performance is practically always a shared resource, and that's what y'all are talking about here...

The brunt cost is taken by the public, whose intellectual property has been expropriated. After all, the worth of our combined data would be at least the sum of the worth of the entire AI industry.

1) In the AI world, that's a very long time ago

2) That still equates to "Meta is not in the AI game any more" in meta-corporate speak

Yes, point two is what I meant.

Anthropic already admitted to heavily monitoring user requests to protect against distillation. They have everything in place, turning on learning from user data would literally be just a couple lines of code at this point. Anyone trusting them not to do it is a fool.

Absolutely. Plus as these companies become hungrier for revenue and to get out of the commodity market they are in, they are only going to get more aggressive in their (ab)use of customer data.

Reminder: don't take medical advice from someone who can't write correctly.

Very interesting though that the original article makes no comment on efficacy. It's all about metabolic safety which is not contentious.

Have you seen my doctor's handwriting?

That’s no insight, just a fact from the entire history of warfare except when one side had rifles/guns and the other didn’t.