The point of the argument is that meaning emerges in conversation. A session between human and AI is a conversation.

Current AI storage paradigms offer lateral memory across the time axis. What exists around me?

A bit branch is longitudinal memory across the time axis. What exists behind me?

Persist type checked decision trees within it. Your git history just became a tamper-proof, reproducible O(1) decision tree. Execution becomes a tree walk.

It works. And it's not production ready yet.

AI content is clearly marked as such.

The rest is written by me personally on my shoddy MacBook.

> MacBook

That explains the writing style.

You don't understand my writing. Hence I must be stupid.

Interesting conclusion. ;)

Or people like the neuroqueer author.

It's a synthesis of multiple problem domains that thought they were special. When the truth is: they weren't.

It was fragmented? Good.

Welcome to reality. ;)

I wonder how Kubernetes would look like if it was built on top of the BEAM.

I think Amy null is working on that. I got a taste of it since I wrote a vm orchestrator in elixir...

It should definitely be possible. With protocols and behaviours it should be easy to build plugins that "just work".

Is that project posted anywhere? Or is there a way to follow its development?

https://github.com/queer/mahou There's a discord server, and a video about it too.

Ah, perfect. Thanks for the link!

This talk by Saša Jurić (author of Elixir in Action) should answer most of your questions regarding the benefits of the BEAM (Erlang VM).

https://youtu.be/JvBT4XBdoUE

Seriously, if you're even the slightest bit curious you should watch the talk, I'm very confident that you'll find impressive what the BEAM brings to the table.

I will (even though I have no idea what Elixir in Action is). Thanks!

Just FYI `<>` is already the string concatenation operator. Just in case you're not aware. :)

Ah thanks, I think HN ate my character. It’s ‘<*>’ with a asterisk in between.

That would be my guess as well.

Rust seems to be a good choice considering their initial reasoning behind choosing OCaml. It offers static typing with support for sum types and is reasonably fast, while certainly providing more in terms of libraries.

What's your take on dhall-lang[^1] for configuration?

[^1]: https://dhall-lang.org/